hausdok Posted November 22, 2004 Report Posted November 22, 2004 Business is tough. You lose work to lower priced competitors left and right. You want to charge more, but youââ¬â¢re afraid. Youââ¬â¢re afraid people wonââ¬â¢t pay and deep down, youââ¬â¢re afraid your service isnââ¬â¢t even worth what youââ¬â¢re charging now. And yet, you canââ¬â¢t afford to improve. Youââ¬â¢re barely making it as it is. You need a dose of positive pricing Positive pricing is setting price levels to support the quality of service you want to give people, that people deserve, and that commands a premium. Itââ¬â¢s setting the price levels *in advance* of improving the service and then investing to raise service levels to meet your pricing. Billââ¬â¢s Dilemma Bill was hired to improve an operation that was slipping. After years of steady increases, the number of sales fell the year before Bill was hired. Five years before Bill showed up, the operation was better than any of its closest competitors. Since then, quality fell to middle of the pack and was now, near the bottom. When the organization met one of its closest competitors head-to-head, it typically lost the battle. Prices were middle of the road. The two competitors with the best overall quality charged over 10% more. The low price competitor, which charged less than half of Billââ¬â¢s price, also had the lowest quality. Bill immediately made two moves. He hired the best people he could find and he raised prices. He didnââ¬â¢t raise them a little. He raised them a lot. Prices went up 40%. Bill now charged more than any of his competitors. His prices are more than 25% higher than the quality leaders. Performance got worse before it got better. Transactions fell by 5% Billââ¬â¢s first year and another 7% his second. The most loyal customer group shrank 9%. Some wonder whether Billââ¬â¢s price increase was a mistake. After all, 40% is a lot to swallow. What good does it do to raise prices if prices are driving away customers? In reality, Bill didnââ¬â¢t have a choice. The people he hired and the other overhead he took on was necessary to improve quality. The price hike was necessary to pay for it. Billââ¬â¢s price hike didnââ¬â¢t cost him revenue. Yes, the number of sales fell by 7%, but the average sale was worth 40% more. Total revenue jumped by more than 30%. Thatââ¬â¢s huge. Bill is Bill Byrne, the Athletic Director for Texas A&M. According to the Dallas Morning News, Byrne ââ¬Åhas no regrets about raising prices, saying it was necessary to fund an elite athletic department. He believes a winning team will fill the stadium.ââ¬
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now