David Meiland Posted October 23, 2010 Report Posted October 23, 2010 The highest energy factors for electric water heaters are .95 - .96. There's always jacket loss. Jacket loss within the conditioned envelope isn't loss, it's radiation- refrigerators and incandescent lighting are both near 100% efficient throughout the heating season. Correct, but in an electric water heater, 100% of the energy does not go to heating the water. If it did, it would be 100% efficient.
Tom Raymond Posted October 23, 2010 Report Posted October 23, 2010 Just leave the refrigerator door open........all the extra heat from non-stop operation keeps the house warm. And my beer. Gotta be a better way.
Greg Booth Posted October 23, 2010 Report Posted October 23, 2010 Correct, but in an electric water heater, 100% of the energy does not go to heating the water. If it did, it would be 100% efficient. Sure-some of the juice is used to keep the little interior light on []
MPdesign Posted November 5, 2010 Report Posted November 5, 2010 For tankless just keep in mind that a family of four with a standard hot water heater will normally take short showers because they run out of hot water. Give the same family an endless supply and the 5 minute average US shower becomes 10+. Make sure the shower heads are all low flow (I have one nd they do work great and I do not miss OLD STYLE) and that will help also. Conclusion: More efficient - Yes (especially if installed near primary point of use - losses traversing cold piping is horrible) A savings - NOT in many households (per informal study of those who added them in my office).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now