Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Right, shouldn't have more than one conductor per terminal, but that's not the big fish in the photos. The big fish is the aluminum conductors. There was discussion in this forum on that topic recently. Check it out Anatol.

Marc

Posted

It looks like he nicked those Al wires as well in the process of stripping off the insulation. This makes matters even worse, creates a hot spot which has been weakened.

You probably saw the double taps above the bus, that's another major bad.

Posted

The double taps were for a surge protector installed in the panel.

Still not allowed unless the terminals are listed for more then one conductor. That one is not listed for more then the one conductor, so it's wrong

Posted

Anatol,

Here is a document I use in my reports sometimes. It helps explain the doubled neutrals part of the issue. The doc is hosted at my server and it will always be there in case you ever want to insert the link into a report.

http://home.comcast.net/~marylandhomein ... rounds.pdf

It's curious that Jim Pauley doesn't mention 110.14(A) in that blurb. It contains language that requires terminals for more than one conductor to be so identified. It and its forebears have been in the NEC for decades. In my opinion, it's a much stronger argument than 110.3(B).

- Jim Katen, Oregon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...