Richard Saunders Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 I got chewed out big time today by the seller because I told my client I had inspected the home previously (for the seller). Called unprofessional, what does my "unauthorized distribution is prohibited" mean). I wrote back that I always disclose that to the client, never talk about specifics or the prior inspection and that I would feel very dishonest walking around pretending I had never seen the place before. I know exactly why she is pissed. Do you all disclose prior inspections?
hausdok Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 WAC 308-408C-020 Ethics The home inspector must: (2) Provide full written disclosure of any business or familial relationships or other conflicts of interest between themselves and any other party to the transaction. The parties may include, but are not limited to, buyers, sellers, appraisers, real estate licensees, mortgage representative, tile companies, vendors and service contractors. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Jim Katen Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 I got chewed out big time today by the seller because I told my client I had inspected the home previously (for the seller). Called unprofessional, what does my "unauthorized distribution is prohibited" mean). I wrote back that I always disclose that to the client, never talk about specifics or the prior inspection and that I would feel very dishonest walking around pretending I had never seen the place before. I know exactly why she is pissed. Do you all disclose prior inspections? Yes (If I remember) I disclose that I inspected a house before. Sometimes I don't remember the house but I find certain marks that I typically leave in certain places. Then I call my wife and ask her to search the database to find out if I inspected it in the past. The seller is being an ass. Disclosing that you performed an inspection isn't the same as distributing the inspection or disclosing your findings. Gently explain that the disclosure is best for everyone. If that doesn't work, tell him to bite you. - Jim Katen, Oregon
Richard Moore Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 "I know exactly why she is pissed." I'll take a stab. Something serious from the first inspection the seller didn't fix, she didn't include in her disclosure, and was hoping would go un-noticed by a different inspector?
kurt Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 Hell yes, you better disclose it. I always do. Anyone gets too whacky about it, tell to do what Jim said.
hausdok Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 From? Look at my location. WAC - Washington Annotated Code. It's in our home inspection law. Don't you have some kind of licensing or registration law in PA? ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Phillip Posted February 28, 2010 Report Posted February 28, 2010 I tell my clients that I have inspected the home before if I remember I have. I have got some inspections from the client seeing the report that I did on the house when the seller was my client. The seller would show them the report.
Richard Saunders Posted February 28, 2010 Author Report Posted February 28, 2010 "I know exactly why she is pissed." I'll take a stab. Something serious from the first inspection the seller didn't fix, she didn't include in her disclosure, and was hoping would go un-noticed by a different inspector? I think that has to be it. She didn't disclose that she had had an inspection, didn't want anybody to know, and didn't disclose any of the defects found.
Marc Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 You must be a dang good inspector Richard. Seller's selfish. Doesn't want anyone using you on her own house now that she's trying to sell it. Makes it harder to sell, especially if it's got major findings on it. But, of course, it is safer and ethical for you to disclose. Marc
Richard Saunders Posted March 1, 2010 Author Report Posted March 1, 2010 Really wasn't anything that bad, pretty typical mid 1980's. She is selling it for an estate and I think wants to tell buyers she doesn't know anything about it. What gets me is that now I am the "unethical" one. I guess it's called spin.
Scottpat Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 Really wasn't anything that bad, pretty typical mid 1980's. She is selling it for an estate and I think wants to tell buyers she doesn't know anything about it. What gets me is that now I am the "unethical" one. I guess it's called spin. You need to oil up those back feathers and just let it roll off; like water on a ducks back! Let her fuss, complain and threaten as you have not done anything wrong. It is her that is being dishonest.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now