Robert Jones Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 Home built in 1957. This was the predominate wiring that was visible in the attic and crawl space. All of the outlets were 2 prong or 3 prong(ungrounded). Was this wiring an update at some point? Or was it used in the mid fifties? Not finding any answer from the magic of google. Click to Enlarge 68.18 KB
Richard Moore Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 That would be fairly normal, original wiring for the period. It's usually referred to as "cloth covered NM cable". Nothing wrong with it except, of course, it lacked a grounding wire at that time (which became the norm shortly after...early 60's if I have that right). It doesn't have the same issues as knob and tube, but to bring the home up to modern standards you would still need to run newer "romex".
Jim Katen Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 Home built in 1957. This was the predominate wiring that was visible in the attic and crawl space. All of the outlets were 2 prong or 3 prong(ungrounded). Was this wiring an update at some point? Or was it used in the mid fifties? Not finding any answer from the magic of google. As Richard said, it's the standard NM of the period. It's more easily damaged by heat than modern NM so you might find that it's damaged just above ceiling fixtures or other places where it'd be exposed to high temps. Other than that, I've never heard that its been particularly troublesome. - Jim Katen, Oregon
hausdok Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 Yep, Rag wrap. 60°C cable. It doesn't like heat at all. Does well in our region but not so well in attics in hotter parts of the country. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Neal Lewis Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 In these parts, that wiring has a ground conductor in it. It's marked something like NM #14/2. What would the marking be without a ground?
mgbinspect Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 In these parts, that wiring has a ground conductor in it. It's marked something like NM #14/2. What would the marking be without a ground? Yup a staple here. And the ground wire will be slightly undersized by todays standards.
Richard Moore Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 In these parts, that wiring has a ground conductor in it. It's marked something like NM #14/2. What would the marking be without a ground? If it's from the mid 50's, I doubt it would have a ground. Braided stuff in a home from the early 60's onward probably does have a ground but it would still look much the same. As for markings, today's grounded NM cable actually has a W/G (or sometimes the words "With Ground") marked on it as in "14/2 W/G". The photo below is from a 1964 home and you can see (sort of) it says "14/2 WITH GROUND TYPE NM". I'm guessing the older ungrounded stuff would just say 14/2. Click to Enlarge 23.63 KB This is from "Residential Electrical System Aging Research Project", a link someone kindly posted here earlier this year. Page 17 at http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//PDF/R ... Report.pdf Quote: Until the early 1960s, most NM cable for residential use did not have a grounding conductor. However, changes in the 1962 NEC that mandated equipment grounding for all branch circuits popularized the use of NM cable with ground.
Richard Moore Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 I just found this...Some History of Residential Wiring Practices in the U.S. Kind of a fun read! http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//PDF/P ... Wiring.pdf I really need to go to bed!
hausdok Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 Richard, Thanks very much. That one got saved to my own files. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
mgbinspect Posted February 9, 2010 Report Posted February 9, 2010 I'll second that thank you. Just saved it to my file "HI Reference Room" on my laptop.
Robert Jones Posted February 9, 2010 Author Report Posted February 9, 2010 Thanks for the replies guys. Excellent link Richard.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now