John Dirks Jr Posted November 18, 2009 Report Posted November 18, 2009 I thought this looked wrong. What say you? Are you aware of any manufacturer instructions or code language that supports it being wrong? I'm thinking it would at least slow the rate of evacuation and maybe put some extra stress on the pump due to pressure caused by the restricted discharge line. Click to Enlarge 70.72 KB
Jim Katen Posted November 18, 2009 Report Posted November 18, 2009 I thought this looked wrong. What say you? Are you aware of any manufacturer instructions or code language that supports it being wrong? I'm thinking it would at least slow the rate of evacuation and maybe put some extra stress on the pump due to pressure caused by the restricted discharge line. I seem to remember at least one sump pump manufacturer (Zoller?) used to say that you had to use a discharge line that was the same diameter as the tap on the pump. I don't have the reference handy, though. - Jim in Oregon
Chad Fabry Posted November 18, 2009 Report Posted November 18, 2009 I'm thinking it would at least slow the rate of evacuation and maybe put some extra stress on the pump due to pressure caused by the restricted discharge line. It'll definitely reduce volume but I think you'd find that the pump would draw more current if the discharge were unrestricted. It'll work longer, not harder. Positive displacement pumps excepted. No matter what, it's just dumb, right?
John Dirks Jr Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Posted November 18, 2009 It sure looked dumb. Especially since the garden hose disappeared beneath the grade so I could not see where it went. It was written up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now