Jerry Simon Posted August 9, 2009 Report Posted August 9, 2009 Got a guy who is thinking of buying the house he's currently renting. I set up the inspection, but then called back to make sure the owner gave permission for such. Tenant wouldn't agree to get such permission, and I cancelled the job. Your thoughts?
StevenT Posted August 9, 2009 Report Posted August 9, 2009 What form of permission were you looking for?
Jerry Simon Posted August 9, 2009 Author Report Posted August 9, 2009 What form of permission were you looking for? The tenant's say-so that the seller agreed to such. I ain't looking to get it written in blood - I'll take someone at their word. But he wouldn't agree to get such permission. In a *normal* deal, the seller agrees to let the buyer do the inspection. Here, the seller doesn't know I'll be walking on his roof, removing electrical panel covers, and basically sticking a microscope up the house's arse. I think it's not only common courtesy to inform the homeowner, but I also worry the tenant may want the inspection results to use for a more devious purpose (pissed-off at the landlord and looking to sue). That's one web I don't ever want to get tangled in. But that's me. Just wondering 'bout you guys.
gtblum Posted August 9, 2009 Report Posted August 9, 2009 I think you made a good call. If something about it made you step back, then there must be a good reason. Go with your gut.
Mark P Posted August 9, 2009 Report Posted August 9, 2009 Yea, I agree - good call. If is wants to buy it, why would he not tell the owner as much and that he is going to have it inspected.
hausdok Posted August 9, 2009 Report Posted August 9, 2009 Hi, The tenant might be looking for a list of stuff to throw back at the landlord and the whole, "I want to buy the house," thing might have been a ruse. Not sure that it would have been wrong to do it without conferring with the owner though. After all, I can't remember ever reading in any rental contract that I'd ever signed that I wasn't allowed to go on the roof or look in electrical panels or the crawlspace, etc.; those contracts basically made me responsible for everything about the house for the time that I'd leased it. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Eric B Posted August 10, 2009 Report Posted August 10, 2009 I have done inspections for tenants wanting to buy. I see no problem with the owner not knowing. I'm not changing or altering anything. As for liability, sellers never seem to think of that when they do know of the inspection. I doubt that the rental agreement has a clause about who the tenant has visit the property. Even if it had, how would I know that. Such an issue would be between the tenant and owner. At least by my reckoning. I don't even ask if permission has been given.
Jerry Simon Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Posted August 10, 2009 I have done inspections for tenants wanting to buy. I see no problem with the owner not knowing. I'm not changing or altering anything. As for liability, sellers never seem to think of that when they do know of the inspection. I doubt that the rental agreement has a clause about who the tenant has visit the property. Even if it had, how would I know that. Such an issue would be between the tenant and owner. At least by my reckoning. I don't even ask if permission has been given. Truth be told, I mighta felt the same way if I wasn't so frickin' busy. Two Friday, two yesterday, two today, and a 6,000+ sf house tomorrow. Maybe I just sub-consciously wanted Tuesday off (though I just re-booked it a few minutes ago). Eric, want a job for a tenant? Gimme a call if you're interested, though it's in Rockford (I did include a travel fee, so...?).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now