Robert Jones Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 What is the technical name for beam jutting out from the gable end of the roof? Click to Enlarge 28.96 KB
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 Hi Rob, Well, in this case it's a lookout that's missing its diagonal brace. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Robert Jones Posted July 16, 2009 Author Report Posted July 16, 2009 Thanks Mike and of course it's rotted.
AHI in AR Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 In newer construction, at least around here, that's called a lookout, and one is provided every few feet. However, based on the fact that I see 1 X roof decking, I am assuming that this is an older home from the 20s or 30s. In that case, what you really have is a gable bracket, sometimes called a corbel. (For the record, I'm not saying that's right.) In any case, gables framed with this type of bracket typically have a fairly large span between them. Unfortunately, it's missing the lower segments which provide the support. That's why it's sagging...
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 The choice is up to you. I used lookout because it's the nomenclature used to describe that detail in old craftsman era texts. This is no-doubt one of the many craftsman-era homes we see around here on a daily basis. From the Illustrated Dictionary of Building Materials and Techniques Corbel 1. A decorative wooden bracket used to support a projecting weight, such as a shelf or countertop. 2. Any weight-supporting structure projecting horizontally out from a vertical surface. Lookout 1. A structural member running from the outside wall to the lower end of a rafter; used to support the plancier or soffit. 2. In a gable roof, a horizontal member attached to the last two rafters at the gable end and extending out to support the barge rafter. 3. A short wooden bracket that supports the overhanging portion of a second story. OT - OF!!! M.
kurt Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 That particular "beam" is more of a flaccid appendage than anything else. If there were a diagonal and a comprehensible structural purpose, I'd call it a lookout.
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 Hi, Yeah, they have a purpose; to support the overhang. There are typically 3 on a small gable and 5 on a large one. They look beefy but are typically secured to the building with mongo-sized spikes driven through the exterior sheathing into blocks in the wall cavity. Sometimes there are huge lags from the backside. Sometimes they're just toe-nailed to the sheathing without any blocks in the wall cavity and destined to fail. Lots of aluminum and vinyl siding guys yank off the diagonal portion because it gets in their way and then the eaves start to sag more, and more, and more.... ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Robert Jones Posted July 16, 2009 Author Report Posted July 16, 2009 Thanks guys. The home was built in 1921. On a side note, Mike how do you like that book, Illustrated Dictionary of Building Materials and Techniques? I was considering the Means Illustrated Construction Dictionary. Do you have any experience with both?
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 Nope, Only have the one and I rarely crack it's cover. I bet I haven't opened it 50 times in the past 13 years. I just read a ton of crap and pick stuff up here and there. Some of it's good, some of it's bad. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 It is absolutely not a purlin - not even close. OT - OF!!! M.
caryseidner Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 Mike, It depends. If the beam runs clear through the house, to or through the other gable end it would be a purlin. If it is only there to support the overhang and is attached to the gable end and/or first couple of rafters than yea, it's a lookout. From the one shot I don't see how you could say it's not even close to a purlin.
Tom Raymond Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 Where's the CF stamp? Cary, if that is in fact a purlin it is very broken. If you look closely at the picture you can see what looks like damage from where the bottom angle brace was removed, and the rotation down and away from the gable sure does look to me like the "beam" is just nailed onto the gable. Besides, the high quality of the workmanship seen in that pic just begs the conclusion that someone hacked off the angle brace. Tom
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 From the one shot I don't see how you could say it's not even close to a purlin. Because I'm in the same market as Rob and I know old houses here. It's not a purlin. In order to shield the walls from the rain, most old homes here have deep gable overhangs and eaves that are at least two feet deep. Lookouts are used to support those. I don't know about Illinois but Bungalows and Craftsmans here aren't built with purlins. About the only time I've ever seen purlins here they were part of the framing system on an A-frame homes or real log homes and then they were a problem. Purlins here are a sure-fire formula for disaster because they'll absorb a lot of moisture through the end grain and, during the rainy season which is about 6 months of the year sometimes, that moisture gets pulled deep into the member. That's when they come under attack from rot and insects. We have a bug out here that trolls for targets of convenience like rotting lookouts or purlins - the Pacific Dampwood Termite. They don't nest in very large colonies but they are big and they can do a lot of damage to a home with purlins. I had an A-frame about a year ago where the purlins looked fine from the ground but the rot and PDWT had moved well beyond the gable end wall into the framing. Sometimes we'll have more modern houses built in the 60's or 70's here where the architect thought it was a good idea to extend 6 by 12 beams through the walls a couple of feet, and out beyond the barge rafters, to simulate the appearance of lookouts. Those too are often rotting and hollowed out by critters. The only thing holding that piece of wood to the house now is a few nails driven into the end grain from the backside of the vertical portion of the lookout that's concealed behind the siding and is attached to the house. That plus a few nails toe nailed into it from that Barge rafter. Without that diagonal brace it's not holding up squat and if it's rotten one can probably yank it off by hand. The roof sheathing that's overhanging the end of the house is what's holding up that barge rafter now. That's really only every other board because that roof would have originally been decked with skip and the short fill-in pieces only extend a few inches beyond the gable end rafter and don't provide any support. Strike that. Correction; What I said above about stiffness of the overhang only applies if it's still got the original cedar shingle deck under whatever is there now. If the roof has ever been stripped down to the framing for a re-roof with asphalt, they've probably decked it with plywood or OSB, which will impart a little additional stiffness and resistance to bending than the skip can. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Robert Jones Posted July 16, 2009 Author Report Posted July 16, 2009 Mike, The roof has been stripped down and re-roofed with comp and OSB. The roof was approx 5 yrs old.
hausdok Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 Mike, The roof has been stripped down and re-roofed with comp and OSB. The roof was approx 5 yrs old. So now you've got nice springboards for an overhang. OT - OF!!! M.
JS Wright Posted July 17, 2009 Report Posted July 17, 2009 only a picture from the inside could tell us what is happening.
JS Wright Posted July 17, 2009 Report Posted July 17, 2009 with a lookout that close to the roof it should be tied to the next rafter back.
hausdok Posted July 17, 2009 Report Posted July 17, 2009 with a lookout that close to the roof it should be tied to the next rafter back. You would think, but it's not. They are a simple triangle. Depending on whether it's a 4-inch or 6-inch lookout, it's made up of a 2 by 6, 3 by 6, 2 by 8 or 3 by 8 vertical leg secured to the side of the structure as I stated above with a horizontal member and a diagonal brace secured to the vertical leg. They're remarkably resilient; I've seen some that are over a hundred years old and they're still in great shape. It really depends on the care they get over their lifetime. On the other hand, I've seen new ones on installed on 10-year old homes that were called Craftsman Inspired" and they've already begun to rot. Inspired by craftsmen I suppose but not made by real craftsmen. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
JS Wright Posted July 17, 2009 Report Posted July 17, 2009 I agree wit the strenth, but with one that close to the roof there is not much room for the brace.
hausdok Posted July 17, 2009 Report Posted July 17, 2009 I agree wit the strenth, but with one that close to the roof there is not much room for the brace. Yep, that's probably because someone cobbled an addition onto that structure. OT - OF!!! M.
JS Wright Posted July 17, 2009 Report Posted July 17, 2009 when you look at how the siding ends you're probably right.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now