Phillip Posted March 1, 2009 Report Posted March 1, 2009 Another question that could be on there is: Would you have E & O if the state did not require you to carry it?
Jack Ahern Posted March 21, 2009 Report Posted March 21, 2009 IF I had a choice---NO a thousand times NO. Comm. of Mass. requires coverage as a requirement for license.[:-banghea
Steven Hockstein Posted March 21, 2009 Report Posted March 21, 2009 NJ Home Inspectors are required to carry insurance.
Tom Raymond Posted March 22, 2009 Report Posted March 22, 2009 When the Feds decide to file charges against the racketeers who run insurance companies I'll think about it. Until then I only buy coverage that is required, a little more if it is a bargain. My GL policy is a good example, for $16 more a year I more than quadrupled my coverage. Tom If only I could convince my wife that health insurance isn't manditory[:-banghea
Northwoodschuck Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 I don't have it and will only buy it if I'm forced to do so![:-monkeyd
ghentjr Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 Do you carry E&O insurance coverage? Yes.
randynavarro Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 Yes, but I waffle every year on whether to re-up.
Richard Moore Posted October 16, 2009 Report Posted October 16, 2009 Honestly, I really don't feel I need it but, at this point in an old fart's life, I just don't want to risk my savings, equity, etc. And it keeps the wife from worrying (very important). On the bright side it is a business expense and therefore tax deductable so, for me, the true cost is 30+% less than the actual amount.
John Dirks Jr Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 No. Now, how do I vote in the poll? I can't find the buttons.
hausdok Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 That means that you've already voted. OT - OF!!! M.
John Dirks Jr Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 That means that you've already voted. OT - OF!!! M. I must have forgot that I did. I should have replied that time too. Thanks.
RickSab Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 I do not. I don't own anything. The tools and computer are the only thing the company owns so they would get them but nothing else. I had everything put into a trust that can not be touched. Al least that is what the lawyer says, and thats my daughter so nothing will be left if she is wrong.
Jim Katen Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 I do not. I don't own anything. The tools and computer are the only thing the company owns so they would get them but nothing else. I had everything put into a trust that can not be touched. Al least that is what the lawyer says, and thats my daughter so nothing will be left if she is wrong. What happens if you receive a large judgement against you? Can they not go after your future earnings? - Jim Katen, Oregon
Brandon Whitmore Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 What happens if you receive a large judgement against you? Can they not go after your future earnings? Could that be why businesses go under, and then start up under a different name?
Jim Katen Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 What happens if you receive a large judgement against you? Can they not go after your future earnings? Could that be why businesses go under, and then start up under a different name? Probably. But I'm not sure that it would work very well for a home inspector. If it's a high-stakes suit, the plaintiff is going to go after the business as well as the inspector personally. - Jim in Oregon
Tom Raymond Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 I know we live in a litigous society but, if someone has the proclivity to to seek a legal remedy, wouldn't that someone be more likely to hire service providers that have assets worth seizing? Personaly, I think the big franchise, or the guy who advertises " Fully Insured" is a much better target than the little independent guy. Hopefully I'll never have to find out if I'm wrong. Tom
Smartazz Posted July 25, 2010 Report Posted July 25, 2010 Wish I didn't have to.... Scum sucking vultures aren't worth a %$&^. If I miss something more than my $2500 deductable I deserve to lose.
ejager Posted July 25, 2010 Report Posted July 25, 2010 Yup, association requirement, but have seen very few members who advertise it.
hausdok Posted July 25, 2010 Report Posted July 25, 2010 Yup, association requirement, but have seen very few members who advertise it. I'd never advertise it; it's an open invitation that says, "Hey, wanna sue somebody? Try me, there's a jillion moles that I might miss on an inspection that you can make a mountain out of and my carrier will settle-out-court just to get rid of you after I pay them my outrageous deductible." ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now