Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just received a pretty long e- mail from a seller of a property I inspected a ways back. The deal fell through because of my report, and they are ticked off. (very long report).

I am in the process of sending a reply, but am hoping some of you more experienced inspectors wouldn't mind reading their e- mail and my reply to determine whether you think I should or should not send a reply, whether there are things you would change, etc.

The seller's sent of a copy of this e- mail to both Realtor's and it looks like they may be trying to set me up for a lawsuit. If not, they sure took some time writing a very clear e- mail requesting changes be made to the report (not a chance).

If any of you are interested-- let me know so I can e- mail you... just don't keep the copy on file please.

PS- to any of you that read this-- does it sound like they are looking into a lawsuit?

This is probably one of the top 10 worst messages I have received from the selling side of a transaction.

Posted
Originally posted by Brandon Whitmore

I just received a pretty long e- mail from a seller of a property I inspected last week. The deal fell through because of my report, and they are ticked off. (very long report).

I am in the process of sending a reply, but am hoping some of you more experienced inspectors wouldn't mind reading their e- mail and my reply to determine whether you think I should or should not send a reply, whether there are things you would change, etc.

The seller's sent of a copy of this e- mail to both Realtor's and it looks like they may be trying to set me up for a lawsuit. If not, they sure took some time writing a very clear e- mail requesting changes be made to the report (not a chance).

If any of you are interested-- let me know so I can e- mail you... just don't keep the copy on file please.

PS- to any of you that read this-- does it sound like they are looking into a lawsuit?

This is probably one of the top 10 worst messages I have received from the selling side of a transaction.

Oh, do send it, please. jim@benchmarkinspections.com

BTW, I've received more complaints from sellers in the past few months than I've had in the previous 15 years. It's the market. Don't take it personally.

- Jim Katen, Oregon

Posted

Brandon,

I got sued by a seller in February. I wouldn't respond at all, because anything you put in your e-mail can potentially be used against you.

You have no "duty of care" toward the seller of a house you check out, and there's also no contractual privity.

Send me the e-mail if you'd like, and I'll see if my recent experience can be of any help.

bainpropinsp@juno.com

John

Posted

Message sent to both-- thanks for taking the time.

I am actually more concerned with this e- mail because they did not mention suing me in the message... it is just so well worded that I am concerned. I get threatened with lawsuits every so often from listing agent's mostly and never get too concerned.... this one just feels different.

Posted

It's a wonderful day in the neighborhood;

a beautiful day in the neighborhood.

Would you be mine;

could you be mine?

Would you be my neighbor?

Hello Mr. Seller,

Can you say, "Bite me?" [:D]

-----------------------------------------------

You don't want to send it to me, Brandon. I tend to answer things, shall we say, just a tad undiplomatically.

I do have an excellent lawyer in Seattle I can refer you to. For $345 he made a very big developer/builder who was threatening to sue me and demanding that I never inspect any more new homes in any of his developments shut up and quietly slink away into the forest; never to be heard from again, I think.

ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!!

Mike

Posted

Actually I can't, Jerry, for the same reason I told Brandon to ignore the seller's e-mail.

You know, it seems like we're just a bunch of schmucks trading posts on our groovy little forum, but you'd be amazed by how many people anonymously check in to see what we have to say.

Posted

If you have not sent your reply yet, my suggestion at this point would be, dont.

I read their part before you chopped it up and I dont see where they are specifically asking you for a response. Consider that they are just venting and let it go.

If anything make a response very short. Something like:

"It's not my goal to make people unhappy with the results of my service but that end is not in my control. I stand by my report and believe I represented my clients interests in a professional manner".

Put it this way. You yourself are already doubting whether you should send the reply. That's a signal that says "don't do it".

Posted
I got sued by a seller in February. I wouldn't respond at all, because anything you put in your e-mail can potentially be used against you

I have not sent out the e- mail yet-- my finger is floating over that send button... I really want to, but it is not as good as it was. I had a couple friends read it, (the smart ones) and they talked me into taking a few things out.. too bad it was the stuff that gave a smile to my face as I was writing the reply.

I sent you a copy of the e- mail, as well as everyone else that wanted to read a copy.

Posted
Can you say, "Bite me?"

I like that, and my initial reply said that while addressing their concerns. During editing of my reply-- that stuff disappeared.

The reason I kind of want to reply is the fact that I spent a couple hours researching, documenting, etc. and don't want it to go to waste.... but............

If you have not sent your reply yet, my suggestion at this point would be, dont.

Another reason I want to send this out, is that their e- mail was sent to both Realtor's, etc. -- a shorter reply may be a good idea though.

Posted
Originally posted by AHI

If you have not sent your reply yet, my suggestion at this point would be, dont.

I read their part before you chopped it up and I dont see where they are specifically asking you for a response. Consider that they are just venting and let it go.

If anything make a response very short. Something like:

"It's not my goal to make people unhappy with the results of my service but that end is not in my control. I stand by my report and believe I represented my clients interests in a professional manner" . . .

I think that would be a very good response to their letter.

They obviously put a lot of effort into the letter and common courtesy requires a polite response. If you ignore them, they'll just get more & more worked up. If you respond to each allegation, then you've fallen into the trap of an unwinnable argument. Nothing that you can say is going to change their mind.

They're not going to sue you over this stuff. They have no case and any lawyer they talk to will tell them so.

- Jim Katen, Oregon

Posted

Jim's right, mostly. Propriety dictates a very brief, polite response.

The detailed e-mail you sent me, in which you admit to possibly misidentifying materials, would be a major mistake. Moreover, it would likely incite further correspondence which potentially could be used against you.

"They have no case and any lawyer they talk to will tell them so."

The first part is true. The second part is maybe not so true. An irresponsible attorney could generate a few thousand in fees from the sellers whether there's any legitimacy to their claims or not. I have had, sadly, a recent and regrettable experience with this one.

Posted

I wouldn't send a reply. I've got a couple letters like that over the years, and like you, I festered for a few days (okay, maybe a week or two once). Such a response from the seller is usually the end of the matter...they just want to vent, and in this market, who can blame them. If they wanted more, you'd hear from their attorney.

That being said, if you do, a short, polite note would suffice, for all the reasons already said.

By the by, their assumption as to why the buyer walked is just that; an assumption. Heck, the other day, my client looked out the kitchen window and realized, for the first time, he was buying a house that backed up to a cemetery; he freaked. I'm sure he'll be using my report to back out of the deal.

Posted

I had a seller(crappy home builder) file a complaint with my state license board. He was upset because I said that the 1/4" plywood cover on the attic opening in the garage was wrong and that I said that the rolled roofing material he used on the flat roof was wrong. He was also upset that I said something about untempered glass windows on both sides of a corner tub. Those are the things he noted in his complaint. I had many more items.

The buyer walked.

So the seller hired his own "home inspector" to inspect the home. His inspector passed the home with flyng colors. The inspections all took place back in September 2007. As of last week the house is still for sale.

The seller filed the complaint via the internet on January 5, 2008. I have been messing with it since then. About three weeks ago I fired off my final letter to the builder responses. What has been happening is that I would respond and then the builder would respond to my response and on and on and on. I finally asked for the license board to end the debate. I received a letter yesterday saying the State could find no error in my inspection or reporting of the inspection.

Posted
Originally posted by Jim Katen

Originally posted by AHI

If you have not sent your reply yet, my suggestion at this point would be, dont.

I read their part before you chopped it up and I dont see where they are specifically asking you for a response. Consider that they are just venting and let it go.

If anything make a response very short. Something like:

"It's not my goal to make people unhappy with the results of my service but that end is not in my control. I stand by my report and believe I represented my clients interests in a professional manner" . . .

I think that would be a very good response to their letter.

They obviously put a lot of effort into the letter and common courtesy requires a polite response. If you ignore them, they'll just get more & more worked up. If you respond to each allegation, then you've fallen into the trap of an unwinnable argument. Nothing that you can say is going to change their mind.

They're not going to sue you over this stuff. They have no case and any lawyer they talk to will tell them so.

- Jim Katen, Oregon

Count me in with Jim on this one. I would respond politely but say nothing about the substance of the report.

Posted

Yesterday, I was sure I was going to reply to all of their concerns individually. I took y'alls advice and chose not to address each individual concern. I sent a very short, polite reply back.

Thanks for everyones help/ advice.

By the way, I still really, really want to stick it to them and do a full reply, but will not. [:-graduat

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...