Chad Fabry Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 What's the advantage to having a split bus panel?
kurt Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 In most cases, it means the house was built in the 50's, so it's not a total piece of crap. (That's pretty much the only places I see them....[8D]) Enough of the humor, now for the weather.....
Jim Katen Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 Originally posted by Chad Fabry What's the advantage to having a split bus panel? It eliminates the cost of a main breaker, which can be expensive. - Jim Katen, Oregon
Richard Moore Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 I donââ¬â¢t know the actual history behind them, but Iââ¬â¢m sure it wasnââ¬â¢t the original intent of the 6-throw rule, which I believe was to ensure a reasonable number of disconnects grouped together in one place to allow quick service disconnect. I suspect it went as followsâ⬦ Some bright spark at FPE or Zinsco, or whichever company did it first, read the rule and had an ââ¬ÅEurekaââ¬
Ken Meyer Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 The disadvantages are that the homeowner may not understand how to shut off power to the lighting (120V) circuits, and that even after doing so, the 240V circuits are still energized. Often in older homes the panels are poorly labeled, and sometimes additional single pole breakers have been added in the upper (240V) section, which should be reserved for double pole breakers (maximum of 6). The added circuit(s) in the upper section would still be energized after the homeowner thinks they have shut off power to the lighting circuits. Having a single main disconnect is a big improvement.
hausdok Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 Ken, We know that. He wants to know what the "advantages" of having a split-bus panel are. I didn't answer 'cuz I don't really consider them an advantage. OT - OF!!! M.
Bill Kibbel Posted February 26, 2008 Report Posted February 26, 2008 The only advantage that I can possibly think of is an economical advantage.
Brian G Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 I agree; there is no advantage for consumers, only disadvantage. Truth be told, this is just one of those "because we can" things that never should have been allowed (like backwiring devices). I'm of the opinion that a single main should be required for residential service equipment, period. That would be the simplest and safest situation for consumers. Brian G. Maybe Someday [:-indiffe
Chad Fabry Posted February 27, 2008 Author Report Posted February 27, 2008 Thanks guys. The reason for their existence has always eluded my common sense radar and I've never bothered to find out why they were made. That's one more thing checked off my list of "Things to do before I die."
Jim Katen Posted February 27, 2008 Report Posted February 27, 2008 Originally posted by Chad Fabry Thanks guys. The reason for their existence has always eluded my common sense radar and I've never bothered to find out why they were made. That's one more thing checked off my list of "Things to do before I die." The design precedes breaker panels. The fuse panels of the previous era were mostly a "split bus" design. The simplest of these had a "lighting main" and a "range" main. When breakers came along, the manufacturers just mimicked the fuse panels that already existed. - Jim Katen, Oregon
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now