Jerry Simon Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Why would this trap be here? It's downstream from already-trapped kitchen sink and slop-sink waste lines. What problems does double-trapping cause? Siphoning-out both? Image Insert: 159.58 KB
hausdok Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 That's not going to siphon any trap dry, it's too far away from the first trap to do that. Don't know why anyone would put a trap there. OT - OF!!! M.
Bain Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Plumbers call that a "running trap," and it isn't allowed here. It's shinier than the other PVC; probably a well intended improvement by a Bubba.
Jim Katen Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Perhaps it was someone's attempt at constructing an expansion offset. Was the trap in the middle of a particularly long, straight run? - Jim Katen, Oregon
fqp25 Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Somebody could have installed that running trap to serve a floor drain or condensate drain they added "after the fact". (Post Construction). I've seen that a lot. Is that Tee a vent or another drain line?
Jerry Simon Posted December 16, 2007 Author Report Posted December 16, 2007 Originally posted by Jim Katen Perhaps it was someone's attempt at constructing an expansion offset. Was the trap in the middle of a particularly long, straight run? - Jim Katen, Oregon Yes.
Jerry Simon Posted December 16, 2007 Author Report Posted December 16, 2007 Originally posted by fqp25 Somebody could have installed that running trap to serve a floor drain or condensate drain they added "after the fact". (Post Construction). I've seen that a lot. Is that Tee a vent or another drain line? Drain.
Chris Bernhardt Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 I have seen the use of a running trap on the laundry drain alot here on older construction. When I see it done in ABS or PVC it means that Bubba replaced the line and was just copying what was there before. The functional issue is that the velocity of water entering the trap is not enough to scour the trap and keep it clean. Ideally you want your traps at the end of a vertical drop so that turbulence occurs and scours the trap. Chris, Oregon
kurt Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Originally posted by Jim Katen Perhaps it was someone's attempt at constructing an expansion offset. Was the trap in the middle of a particularly long, straight run? - Jim Katen, Oregon Does anyone ever see expansion offsets in real life? Not sure I ever have(?).
Jim Katen Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Originally posted by kurt Originally posted by Jim Katen Perhaps it was someone's attempt at constructing an expansion offset. Was the trap in the middle of a particularly long, straight run? - Jim Katen, Oregon Does anyone ever see expansion offsets in real life? Not sure I ever have(?). I've seen a few in residential and many in commercial. They're the sort of thing that you don't notice unless it's missing. Here's one where they forgot to install one. It's a hot water distribution line. It runs about 100' down a hallway in a straight line -- that is till they put hot water into it. Then it twisted into a snake-like shape. - Jim Katen, Oregon Download Attachment: MissingOffset .JPG 105.77 KB
Eric B Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 "They're the sort of thing that you don't notice unless it's missing." Not for me! I'd notice it if it was THERE! The idea of providing for expansion would have never crossed my mind. Jim, are the standards for expansion offsets?
Jim Katen Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Originally posted by Eric B "They're the sort of thing that you don't notice unless it's missing." Not for me! I'd notice it if it was THERE! The idea of providing for expansion would have never crossed my mind. Jim, are the standards for expansion offsets? It's almost never an issue in residential plumbing. Most houses are too small to need any kind of provision for expansion of plumbing pipes. The only thing I can find in the IRC is a general note in P2605.1. It says, "Piping shall be supported to ensure alignment and prevent sagging, and allow movement associated with the expansion and contraction of the plumbing system." There are also manufacturer's requirements. I've attached page 8 from the Flowguard Gold manual. It contains the standards for offsets. copper.org has similar standards for copper. - Jim Katen, Oregon Download Attachment: FlowguardGoldpg8.pdf 75.03 KB
hausdok Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Hi Jim, You forgot the attachment, no? By the way, isn't the Floguard manual somewhere in the TIJ library? OT - OF!!! M.
kurt Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 That explains why I've never seen one. No PVC pipe in commercial structures around here; it's all iron & copper.
Chris Bernhardt Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 From the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code Section 705.3 Special Joints 705.3.2 Expansion joints. Expansion joints shall be accessible, except when in vent piping or drainage stacks, and may be used where necessary to provide for expansion and contraction of the pipes. BTW I have never seen one. Chris, Oregon
AHI in AR Posted December 16, 2007 Report Posted December 16, 2007 Just out of curiosity in trying to guess why that was done that way...is it possible that the drain just upstream of the trap is coming off a clothes washer? The photo doesn't show its full length. If that was a remodel, it may have seemed easier to the installer to put the trap there since he had to cut the drain anyway. After all, when you see the drains strapped up with rope slopped over the duct work you have to wonder...
msteger Posted December 18, 2007 Report Posted December 18, 2007 The reason the trap was installed where it is located is because Bubba ran the pipes from either end and cut the pipes before realizing that he was a little short. All he had left over was some small fittings and a trap, so Bubba primed and glued them to make the two PVC lines meet.
hausdok Posted December 18, 2007 Report Posted December 18, 2007 Lot's of theories here but little fact. If there's no prohibition against it, I can't see spending mental effort trying to figure out why some unnamed person at some unnamed time did anything. Come to think of it, I don't try to figure it out even when there is a prohibition against it. It is what it is - dwelling on it for more than a second doesn't seem necessary to me. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! M.
Tedlawson Posted January 22, 2008 Report Posted January 22, 2008 The house trap was on no account planned to take the place of individual fixture traps, and does not achieve the same job as they do. It was simply to keep sewer main sewer gases out of the house structure.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now