hausdok Posted November 26, 2007 Report Posted November 26, 2007 In this Q & A in the Contra Costa Times home inspector pundit, Barry Stone, explains to a homeowner who relied on a seller's inspector that he might have a case against the inspector anyway. To read the entire article click here.
Brian G Posted November 26, 2007 Report Posted November 26, 2007 I hear reports of inspectors who compromise disclosure for the sake of agent referrals, but in my experience such inspectors are rare. Most home inspectors are painfully aware of the legal and financial liability associated with incomplete disclosure and are unwilling to take such risks for fraudulent short-term gains. What planet is he speaking of???? Brian G. Gimme a Break [:-censore
Chris Bernhardt Posted November 26, 2007 Report Posted November 26, 2007 That was my first reaction. I don't care what the complaint is you got to look at the inspectors report and inspection contract. Did Barry do this before throwing out his opinion? The first request out of my mouth would be to send me a copy of his report and contract so I can review it first. The standards allow for inspectors for reasons of safety or prior agreement to disclaim an item of the inspection. In Barry's defence he has brought these points up before. I wonder why he didn't in this article? Chris, Oregon
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now