Scottpat Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 I have never seen the window design that this home had. Home was built in 1890, windows are original with hand blown glass. Download Attachment: IMG_3958.JPG 154.41 KB Download Attachment: IMG_3993.JPG 156.87 KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Hi Scott..Are you sure that is the original glass as after over 100 years the glass would more than likely be distorted from morphic flow. In other words it is basically a liquid. From the picture they look sharp and clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Fabry Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Much is said about glass being thinner at the top of the pane. The fact is it was installed like that. Crown glass especially, tapers in one direction due to the process that was used to produce it, but the truth is it was installed in every orientation so the left of a pane is quite likely to be thinner than the right. Glass does move but for that, a hundred years isn't much of a time frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hausdok Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 I've seen them like that in plenty of old bungalows here. OT - OF!!! M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Bob, Got any credible source for the "morphic flow" theory for window glass? I've always read it was folklore. Glass is an amorphous solid. Chad, I don't think there's much crown method glass after 1870. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 I am too lazy to look up the sources at this very moment,but after spending years working with the stuff and out of coincidence having a conversation on the very subject only hours before this thread I can assure you it is true. The first time I'd ever heard the subject was as a kid going to the state capital and asking the tour guide why the glass in the old capital building was so wavy looking.Other than that I had taken kinetic and neon art courses at the Art Institute of Chicago where the same thing was taught, Over the years I have referenced this many times.In the past I have owned a Neon sign business and am presently trying to develop a mixed media glass tile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Glass is generally treated as an amorphous solid rather than a liquid, though different views can be justified since characterizing glass as either 'solid' or 'liquid' is not an entirely straightforward matter. Pasted this off wikipedia which is a fun easy place for quick info,but not always factual as it is comprised of many opinions that get self edited. Have a book titled The complete Book of Creative Gass Art By Polly Rothenberg which explains on page 6 that once scoring glass separation should be achieved within a few minutes as molecules of glass will actually begin to close ranks thus not allowing a clean break.May not be liquid,but sure doe's describe flow. Bill after looking through the internet I see that prevailing opinion is against me,but after working with it all these years I feel it is a plastic like material and can flow with heat. The question than becomes can light act as a magnifiying glass creating enough heat to cause flow over time. this possibility does not seem to enter the disscussion in what I am reading. Sometimes these scientist types do not look at external factors such as this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Fabry Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Chad, I don't think there's much crown method glass after 1870. Thanks for that. Around here there's a lot of overlap in method from the 1840's on, but I'm sure you're right about this window in an 1890 house. The morphic part is what I was trying to address. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Morrison Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 I see a lot of houses 100 years old and much older in Eastern MA, and in them there's a lot of wavy glass. It is "accepted" but undocumented wisdom that the glass flows over time, but glass experts tell me that the thickness of old glass just wasn't perfectly uniform and most installers would naturally install a pane with the thicker end on the bottom. This makes sense to me. In my experience, the original glass in house built in say, 1870 has been much wavier than the original glass in a house built in 1900, where the glass seems not to have "flowed" at all. So, I think Chad is probably right when he points out that glass may flow over time, but it probably takes a lot longer than 100 years or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfSwamp Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Originally posted by Scottpat I have never seen the window design that this home had. Home was built in 1890, windows are original with hand blown glass. Download Attachment: IMG_3958.JPG 154.41 KB Download Attachment: IMG_3993.JPG 156.87 KB Windows like that are pretty common here in town. A lot of people call them "Queen Anne" windows, because one often sees them on Queen Anne houses. The house in the picture is what some people call a "Princess Anne," because it's not big and fancy enough to be called a Queen Anne. My former boss, and founder of Old-House Journal, Clem Labine, shot steam out of his ears every time he heard the term, "Princess Anne." I'm pretty sure that's not blown glass. It's just late 1800s glass. Don't believe everything you hear in Spring Hill. Did you see any "bullseyes" in the glass? WJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Kubs Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 I'm not at all an expert on this but... I have done a bit of work with glass and quite a bit of reading on how glass plate was and now is made. Also have a bit of a background in chemistry & physics. And a past life of antique restoration, a lot of which involved replacing broken glass, which of course had to be replaced with "correct glass" from the period, hence the reading... To my knowledge glass has no morphic structure at normal or anything but very high temperatures. Being a crystalline structure it is not possible for it to flow that way. Think about quartz crystals thousands of years old with nice sharp corners and points... When glass was made in the past, as recently as the early 1900's and especially mid to late 1800's it was basically poured out on a table and rolled out "flat". When you see swirls and stuff in glass it is literally from someone troweling out the thick molten glass and working it flat. It was by no means or definition flat & uniform. Later it was successfully drawn in larger sheets and even poured between two rollers but still subject to slight waves and creases. Anything of higher quality had to be ground flat and polished. Not until late 1950's came perfection. A process of pouring the molten glass on top of a bed of molten Tin. "Float Glass" Old houses had small panes that made up larger windows because that is as big a piece as they could make with reasonable flatness. A little light reading on the subject; http://www.glassonline.com/infoserv/history.html And just so you know, my wife says I don't know everything... So maybe there is proof to this Morphic theory out there. I'd like to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottpat Posted May 19, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Hi all, Thanks for the information. Truth be known, I just called it blown-glass as that is what I have always called it. Yes, it had several waves, lines and bubbles. I guess I should have called it Old Glass! [] WJ, this was over in East Nashville off of Greenwood Ave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Could some one explain the occasional older window that has warped? I've only seen it on west exposures, 100yrs+. I'd always bought the liquid-glass-moving-slowly-over-time theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfSwamp Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Originally posted by Scottpat Hi all, Thanks for the information. Truth be known, I just called it blown-glass as that is what I have always called it. Yes, it had several waves, lines and bubbles. I guess I should have called it Old Glass! [] WJ, this was over in East Nashville off of Greenwood Ave. Looks like E Nashville. Also, from the pic, it looks like somebody forgot to to flash that roof/wall joint. FWIW, my 1914 house has a mix of wavy original glass and modern glass, which replaced broken panes. That's fairly typical of turn-of-the-century houses. Finally, I think old-house folk might call those windows not only "Queen Anne" but also 17-over-ones." I have heard that window glass "sags" over time and gets thicker at the bottom. I don't have a source for that, though. WJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenT Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 I don't know about morphic or amorphorus, but I used to be in the glass business and have cut lots of glass. When you score glass and don't break it immediatly, it is as if it was never scored. That is a fact. (immediatly may be a minute or so) Sometimes, when removing a very old storefront, I've noticed that the old lites were thicker at the bottom, it was explained to me that the glass had settled, or sagged or whatever you want to call it. I have never seen the glass to be thicker anywhere but the bottom. I have always considered glass as a liquid... or almost a liquid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randynavarro Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 I've used the term "candy glass" frequently. Maybe incorrectly so, I don't know. I can't remember where I got the term but maybe from my old days in Hollywood making movie sets. I think the special effects guys called it "candy glass" because the panes they put in our sets was made from sugar (to break apart easier). Close up, the stuff looked exactly like the antique glass which is being discussed in this thread. I might have also read that term in trade mags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 The sag is possibly caused buy certain mixtures used in the manufacturing process, such as lead which definitely does sag over time.This is documented in numerous stained glass windows.but with so much disagreement it is obvious you could make an argument for either side. Chad I meant to say amorphic,but am used to using the term morphic resonance as related to biology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted May 25, 2007 Report Share Posted May 25, 2007 When glass was made in the past, as recently as the early 1900's and especially mid to late 1800's it was basically poured out on a table and rolled out "flat". While that may be true about the technology available at those dates, it doesn't apply to window glass in this country. Cylinder glass was used from 1860 until the very end of the 19th century (and even as late as 1915). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now