Scottpat Posted May 18, 2007 Report Posted May 18, 2007 At first I thought that the stairs were in backwards. The I realized that the owner had cut the stairs between the sections for the bottom legs to lay flat on the floor. This one takes the award! Download Attachment: IMG_3964.JPG 95.95 KB
chicago Posted May 18, 2007 Report Posted May 18, 2007 They look as if they would invert when you step on them. Did you use them?
Jesse Posted May 19, 2007 Report Posted May 19, 2007 Saw the same thing on a big split-level in Westchester a couple weeks ago. And yes, they wanted to hyperextend when I used them. One of those days I was happy to be a little guy.
Inspectorjoe Posted May 19, 2007 Report Posted May 19, 2007 Looks like fresh blood in that joint. Ya still have all of your fingers, Scott? [:-thumbu]
Scottpat Posted May 19, 2007 Author Report Posted May 19, 2007 Nope, I put up my LG 17. The hardest part was putting the dang stairs back up. The red was a marker line that the owner used to mark the area to cut.
Focal Point Posted May 21, 2007 Report Posted May 21, 2007 looks like they cut off the corners to clear the opening a little easier, I cant see how that cut would make the legs any straighter. just a thought...
msteger Posted September 6, 2007 Report Posted September 6, 2007 Do you guys note about the obvious garage firewall violation when pulldown ladders are installed in garages? I see these fairly often and always explain the potential issue with the client and agent. I also note that the install may predate building codes although removal or installing a proper fire resistant cover is recommended. Many other local guys do not even note these, from what other agents tell me. The manufacturers of pulldown ladders apparently also do not inform the customer of the hazards of garage installations.
Jim Katen Posted September 6, 2007 Report Posted September 6, 2007 Originally posted by msteger Do you guys note about the obvious garage firewall violation when pulldown ladders are installed in garages? Every time. I see these fairly often and always explain the potential issue with the client and agent. I also note that the install may predate building codes although removal or installing a proper fire resistant cover is recommended. Stop calling it a "potential issue." Start calling it "wrong." Ambiguity is the enemy of clear communication. Why all the nonsense about predating building codes? All that does is create more ambiguity. As for your recommendations, there's nothing in the code about a "fire resistant cover." You're just making that up. What if, in response to your report, they cover the ladder bottom with metal flashing? Also, you might want to stop calling it a firewall. The word firewall has specific meanings in the world of building codes. In that context, a firewall is not required between a garage and a dwelling. Many other local guys do not even note these, from what other agents tell me. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. It shouldn't matter to you. The manufacturers of pulldown ladders apparently also do not inform the customer of the hazards of garage installations. Very true. The manufacturers are weasels. They want to sell ladders. But it shouldn't matter to us. We're not weasels. - Jim Katen, Oregon
SonOfSwamp Posted September 6, 2007 Report Posted September 6, 2007 As soon as I realized that the local carpenters couldn't figure out the long and short of cutting those wretched wood folding stairs, I started telling customers to yank out the old stairs. I told them to buy the heavy-duty metal stairs, or the ones that deploy like giant scissors. Or, better yet, get somebody to build a permanent stair to the attic. That said, I included graphics from stair manufacturers, showing the right and wrong ways to install the stairs. WJ
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now