Haubeil Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 I need confirmation that this is BLACK MOLD, in the attached pics. I'm not familiar with mold...to say with confidence, thus consider a recommendation. I'm not sure how to write it up in the report. Is this something that can be removed and safetly lived in? Thanks in advanced!!! - Haubeil Download Attachment: Picture 091.jpg 63.4 KB Download Attachment: Picture 092.jpg 67.08 KB Download Attachment: Picture 094.jpg 65.13 KB
mgbinspect Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 More than anything else that simply looks like a severely underventilated attic and a poorly sealed hatch of stairway allowing moisture and dust to condensate on the surfaces. Certainly, it could be treated for fungi as a precaution, but I don't think I'd go strongly down the mold path.
Les Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Haubeil, You answered your own question. You are not familiar with mold and there ain't no way anyone on this board can tell you via answer. Could be mildew. Note how it is not on the framing, yet on the plywood. Maybe plywood has an ingredient as a food source. Point is just write what you know and never tell someone it is Black Mold unless you know. Too much emotion involved for an average inspector. You are there to inspect, unless you happen to be a "mold for gold" inspector.
mgbinspect Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Yup, What Les said. Most likely, the reason the sheathing is dark is: Due to thermal mass, the rafters don't allow frost to form as quickly as will the sheathing and top surface of the insulation. This attic is screaming for ventilation.
DonTx Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Haubeil, Without taking a Sample and sending it in to a lab, you can't tell if it's Black Mold, Really Dark Grey Mold, Kinda Blackish Mold, Soot, Mildew or something else. I agree with the others that it looks like a lack of ventilation. Was this a new roof? Those nail blowouts look fresh. Anyway, as for what you should state in your report, pretty much what you've already said. "I don't know what this is, you'll need an environmental specialist to tell you what it is and if it's safe. The same environmental specialist can also tell you if it can be lived with safely or if it needs removed. All environmental test should be performed and findings obtained before closing." Something along those lines. Just remember, it's okay to say "I don't know" or "I have no idea, you need a specialist to determine that." That's what specialist do.
Scottpat Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Yep, I concur with my brethren. Just say ya don't know what it is but that it does not belong in the attic and it is most likely the result of poor ventilation.
Jim Baird Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Jeff, Let me join the chorus here. I wouldn't get into discussion of "toxic mold" bugaboo. I have seen this same occurence, however, in an attic of a forty year-old house where a new sheet metal roof was laid over shingles and all vents removed. The owner, an original occupant, said the blackness only occured after the new roof, which, by the way, leaked somewhere. Very hard leaks to trace from inside, due to original shingles still there, probably at valleys.
homnspector Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 In the last picture you can see that the protruding nails are rusted, another sign of improper venting. Also note the open junction box (I'm sure you did). I also would not claim it to be mold but I think I would recommend testing to cover my a$$.
mgbinspect Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 There's also a hole in the roof. You can see the ray of light coming down from the left at about 20 degrees.
hausdok Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Hi, The discoloration is fungi and the cause is a poorly ventilated attic and too much moisture-laden air leaking into the attic from somewhere and condensing on the underside of the roof and those rafters. Were the bathroom fans and kitchen fan connected all the way to the roof or were they dumping into the attic? Were there gable end vents used in combination with eave or soffit vents and vents used near the ridge? If so, that's probably half the problem. A competent trade needs to find and fix the source of the moisture migrating into the attic, adjust the insulation at the perimeter to allow more airflow from the eaves to the ridge and then make sure there are properly placed and sufficient number of eaves and upper vents, and that there aren't any gable end vents defeating the vent system. Then the underside of the roof and all of that exposed wood needs to be treated with BoraCare to kill the fungi and make that wood immune to future fungal growth. There's no such thing as "black" mold. That's just a scary term coined by the media and co-opted by lawyers to scare the bejeezuz out of people. There are thousands of different types of fungi and you can't look at it and know which type it is. Besides, why would you want to know which type it is? The CDC and the EPA both say that identifying the type is pointless because it has to be dealt with anyway and the treatment method for one type is the same as for others. Tell the clients that it's there. Tell 'em that the attic ventilation needs to be fixed, the source of the moisture causing it needs to be eliminated and the wood needs to be treated to kill the organism, because they'll eventually lose the roof to rot if it's not treated. Tell them that the identification of types of fungi is outside the scope of what we do, so you have no idea of whether it is one of the alleged "toxic" variety of fungal organisms. Tell 'em that if they are concerned about mold, because they already know that they are allergic to it, to hire a long-established and reputable indoor air quality firm to counsel them on the best and sanest method to deal with the stuff. 10 years ago, we called it mildew and would tell people to fix their attic ventilation, find and fix the source of the air leakage into the attic and treat the fungus to kill it. Inspectors had been doing that for decades and nobody was panicking. Then Ms. Ballard won her $32M lawsuit in Texas and it all miraculously became "toxic" overnight. Ballard's award was reduced to only about $4M on appeal and in the end she received absolutely nothing for mold exposure, because they could not prove a causal connection. Instead, the court punished Farmer's Insurance for having responded sluggishly and in bath faith to her complaint in the first place. The media never really publicized that though. By then the mold train had left the station and was packed with lawyers and mold lawsuits had been born. I'm waiting for the lawsuits over houses that make people ill because the builder was negligent for not having used feng shui to design them and orient them on their sites. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Les Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Geez Mike must has a relaxed schedule! If you notice, everyone that responded says the same thing.
hausdok Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Yeah, finally. I don't know whether you guys noticed it or not but I got so snowed under last month that I didn't get a chance to put out an update. Sitting here this morning trying to do just that. OT - OF!!! M.
Haubeil Posted June 13, 2006 Author Report Posted June 13, 2006 Fellow, you're the GREATEST!!! ....THANKS-A-MILLION!!!! You're not kid'n...y'all are TOP KNOTCH and I greatly appreciate the responses!!! Thanks again, Haubeil
mgbinspect Posted June 13, 2006 Report Posted June 13, 2006 Awww... Shucks.... Our pleasure (I'm sure.)
homnspector Posted June 14, 2006 Report Posted June 14, 2006 This is an interresting article from a link in "another" forum. Puts it in good perspective. http://www.forensic-applications.com/moulds/sok.html
Jim Katen Posted June 14, 2006 Report Posted June 14, 2006 Originally posted by homnspector This is an interresting article from a link in "another" forum. Puts it in good perspective. http://www.forensic-applications.com/moulds/sok.html That article is, without a doubt, the best collection of information I've ever seen on the subject. It should be required reading for every home inspector. - Jim Katen, Oregon
kshepard Posted August 12, 2006 Report Posted August 12, 2006 Mr. (KWEE-ving) Connell also has some good insights into radon and as a law enforcement officer, into clandestine drug labs (he gives classes to HI's on how to recognize them and stay safe). 20% moisture is not really the magic number for fungal growth (according to him) because... 1. with a moisture meter, you aren't measuring moisture, you're measuring variations in conductivity. 2. actual moisture available to fungus varies with something called "vapor pressure", something I can't explain... 3. Some types of fugnus can extend rhizomes (act as straws for transporting moisture) for distances of up to 30' in order to import moisture to the material they want to eat. Anyway, his posts are always well thought out and difficult to refute. He occasionally posts on HI forums. He also acts as an expert witness against Home Inspectors in cases in which they've performed mold sampling. You should hear his little speach on Data Quality Objectives. If you don't know what those are, you'd better hope you never come up against him in court. He's never lost a case against a Home Inspector and he's happy to tell you how to avoid litigation involving sampling for mold. He's a member of the committees tasked with writing the International Mold Sampling Standards and the Colorado Mold Sampling Standards. He will talk to HI chapters. I've heard him. It's an eye-opener. Ask him.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now