Mark P Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Is not the extension supposed to go straight down without all the 90 degree turns? Download Attachment: prv.JPG 62.92 KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurt Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 It can be piped w/elbows; it doesn't necessarily have to be straight down. (Did you comment on the material on the wall behind the water heater? It looks like transite.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Ideally you would not want to see a 90 that close to the TPR. Kinda backs it up right from the get go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Hockstein Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 When I see a Reliance water heater I assume that Uncle Louie came over and helped install the water heater that was purchased at the local home improvement store. At least the TPR was piped downwards! Where does it terminate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEuriech Posted May 22, 2006 Report Share Posted May 22, 2006 Page 14 of the Reliance Instruction Manual says: The discharge opening must not be blocked or reduced in size under any circumstances. Excessive length, over 30 feet (9.14 m), or use of more than four elbows can cause restriction and reduce the discharge capacity of the valve. This would lead you to believe that four elbows are the max that you should use. http://www.reliancewaterheaters.com/lit ... 53-002.pdf Jeff Euriech Peoria, Arizona Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurt Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Sort of, but not really; Reliance goes for the 4 elbow recommendation w/fuzzy language because of perceived corporate liability. I don't think it's that fine tuned an issue; if it was, we'd see limitations on elbows in all supply pipe installations. And, elbows don't "back stuff up from the get go"; they're elbows, not restrictions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terence McCann Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Originally posted by kurt And, elbows don't "back stuff up from the get go"; they're elbows, not restrictions. No Kurt, they are restrictions. One elbow is equal to X amount of feet of pipe. Anytime you design a piping system you need to calculate pressure drop. Elbows are much more restrictive to water flow than straight pipe. The point I was making is the water, discharging from the TP valve, must be asked to immediately change direction, this is a restriction. I still think it's bad pratice to pipe a 90° right after the TP outlet. From A.O. Smith. The temperature-pressure relief valve must be installed directly into the fitting of the water heater designed for the relief valve. Position the valve downward and provide tubing so that any discharge will exit only within 6 inches (153 mm) above, or at any distance below the structural floor. Be certain that no contact is made with any live electrical part. The discharge opening must not be blocked or reduced in size under any circumstances. Excessive length, over 30 feet (9.14 m), or use of more than four elbows can cause restriction and reduce the discharge capacity of the valve, see Figure 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurt Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 This is an example of taking a simple concept & complicating the heck out of it. The restriction that an elbow puts on water flow, at the pressures & flow rates that occur in residential construction, is so miniscule & inconsequential that it almost doesn't exist. These folks put stuff like that in their literature because they have to, not because it matters on a functional level. This is another good example of home inspector's over complicating very simple things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Baird Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 A plumber friend of mine says a local home inspector cited his use of CPVC to pipe discharge as being too low pressure/temp rated. Plumber says open end negates pressure/temp rating as a performance factor. Neither side of the argument is budging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwg27 Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Originally posted by Jim Baird A plumber friend of mine says a local home inspector cited his use of CPVC to pipe discharge as being too low pressure/temp rated. Plumber says open end negates pressure/temp rating as a performance factor. Neither side of the argument is budging. I'm split on it. I buy the open cap negates the pressure rating but not the temp... but doesn't CPVC rate high enough to be used anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now