Jim Baird Posted April 13, 2019 Report Posted April 13, 2019 House framed in 1900. Looks like they sawed the pine right next door. Lots of slab pieces in the skip sheathing and lots of scabs to make length.
Jim Katen Posted April 14, 2019 Report Posted April 14, 2019 Using the live-edge pieces for sheathing was smart. Scabbing the rafters, not so much. Even in 1900, that was a dick move.
Jim Baird Posted April 14, 2019 Author Report Posted April 14, 2019 These rafters barely qualified as 2x4. The steepness allowed them to get away with scabs. Down in the crawl these guys notched away more than half of joist height to rest on ledgers. It is something I see a lot of, but only rarely have I seen joist split as a result of over notching.
AHI in AR Posted April 14, 2019 Report Posted April 14, 2019 The steepness doesn't help when you account for wind load...
Tom Raymond Posted April 15, 2019 Report Posted April 15, 2019 As for the overnotched joists, they rarely split but they always bounce.
Chad Fabry Posted April 15, 2019 Report Posted April 15, 2019 19 hours ago, Jim Baird said: These rafters barely qualified as 2x4. The steepness allowed them to get away with scabs. Down in the crawl these guys notched away more than half of joist height to rest on ledgers. It is something I see a lot of, but only rarely have I seen joist split as a result of over notching. I see split joists all the time. Maybe it's the difference between SYP and eastern white pine.
Jim Baird Posted April 15, 2019 Author Report Posted April 15, 2019 14 hours ago, AHI in AR said: The steepness doesn't help when you account for wind load... It likely fell short of compliance with the 1900 building code;-)
Marc Posted April 16, 2019 Report Posted April 16, 2019 (edited) 18 hours ago, Chad Fabry said: I see split joists all the time. Maybe it's the difference between SYP and eastern white pine. Now wait just a minute there...Southern Yellow vs Eastern White. Is there a racist subliminal twist going on here? 😁 Edited April 16, 2019 by Marc
Jim Baird Posted April 16, 2019 Author Report Posted April 16, 2019 Heck no Marc. SYP is rated way higher than all those whites, which are lumped together under the SPF category which stands for spruce pine fir.
Jim Baird Posted April 17, 2019 Author Report Posted April 17, 2019 1 hour ago, Les said: I prefer Douglas Fir. How about for floor framing? I have a distant cousin who bought a house built in 1917 by a rich guy south of here. He framed the whole thing from California redwood. No telling what it cost him but the house is still standing straight. Around here SYP or floor trusses are needed for any kind of span, and SYP has been degraded by the standards institutes and the codebooks because the "super trees" being raised now by the wood production experts are so pithy they fail the engineering tests applied by the raters. Someone earlier mentioned bounce. As an AHJ I inspected a modular with floor trusses that passed muster far as I could tell. The owners had moved in a bunch of stuff too early, and when I walked across the dining room the dishes in the floor standing china cabinet all rattled.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now