Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's a stupid title. The idea seems to be more along the lines of a house that will be easier to fix in the future. But that assumes that we'll have the same (or similar) building materials for the next 500 years and the same (or similar) climate.

I see nothing about that house that will make it any more likely to last 500 years than most other houses. And if a house will last 500 years, why not 1,000?

Posted

It's a pretty framing job. Omitting the OSB will get it past the 25 year mark, but none of the other components have more than 50 years life spans.

Is it still the same house if everything has been replaced 10 to 20 times in 500 years?

Posted

No mentions of the R-values he got with that outer jacket, nor of how he met any kind of codes. There is likely lots more exposed NM than he showed us.

The publisher of a line of books I like called Wooden Books lives in an 800 year old house in Wales, so what is so new about this design?

Posted

I saw 300+ year old houses in China...mud brick, parged thick inside and out with lime. Tile roof. No foundation to speak of.

As long as the roof doesn't leak into the mud brick, the things could hit 500, easy.

Posted

Barring floods, earthquakes, landslides, etc, most any house will last as long as someone keeps renewing the sacrificial surfaces.

Heck, the USS Constitution is 220 years old and still afloat and it a freaking ship.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...