hausdok Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 Scenario - house built in 2006. you find these in the panelboard. How would you proceed?
Richard Moore Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 Download Attachment: AFCI_Recall.pdf 169.58?KB Not seeing many of these anymore, but they are still around. If the test button is blue, whenever the house was built, then the date code needs to be checked. I have found that they can be seen without "denergizing the panel" but the red ink is often very faded and unable to be read with the naked eye. So I take a few close-up photos with my camera. I have always been able to read them that way. The last ones I caught, back in May (listed as a 2005 house), I couldn't make up my mind if I was seeing CN or GN, but as both were recalled, no matter. Click to Enlarge 73.6 KB
Scottpat Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 Honestly, I don't think I would say anything about them if everything else looked OK. I never knew anything was wrong with them......
Tom Raymond Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 That makes two of us, but I've never inspected anything newer than '91.
hausdok Posted November 13, 2013 Author Report Posted November 13, 2013 OK, So, they are recalled - good catch on Richard's part - I should have thought about that before I'd posted that photo. That's not where I was going with this one. Let's try another brand, shall we?
Jerry Simon Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 Are you referring to replacing branch-feeder types with combination types for better protection against arc-faults?
hausdok Posted November 13, 2013 Author Report Posted November 13, 2013 Yep, So, how do you frame that recommendation? OT - OF!!! M.
Marc Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 Type BRAF AFCI's are a first generation AFCI's. The combination (parallel and series together in one device) type breaker came later. BRAF breakers detect only parallel arcs (between a conductors). Not allowed anymore in favor of the combination type. I wouldn't recommend replacement, just mention what it is and what's missing in it then leave to the buyer to do what he wants. Them devices are awfully expensive. Marc
Jerry Simon Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 Yep, So, how do you frame that recommendation? OT - OF!!! M. I don't have my boilerplate handy, but it goes along somewhat like this: "Inside your main electrical panelboard, arc-fault circuit breakers are installed (those ones we looked at with the test-buttons). Arc-fault breakers help prevent electrical fires, but the arc-fault breakers in this panel are the older, "branch-feeder" types, and these older breakers don't offer as much protection as the newer style, "combination" types of arc-fault breakers. I strongly recommend you have an electrician replace these old, branch-feeder types of arc-fault breakers with the newer and more reliable/safer combination types of arc-fault breakers."
inspector57 Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 So do you routinely recommend upgrading standard breakers for AFCI breakers? I know there are continual advancements in technology but where do you draw the line in recommending replacements. Leaving the recalled item question, is there anything inherently unsafe about the older generation of AFCI breakers or is it a case of safe, safer, safest?
Jerry Simon Posted November 13, 2013 Report Posted November 13, 2013 So do you routinely recommend upgrading standard breakers for AFCI breakers? I know there are continual advancements in technology but where do you draw the line in recommending replacements. No, but I've heard the NEC is changing (or has changed) to that very requirement; all breakers in a panelboard will soon have to be AFCI types. Leaving the recalled item question, is there anything inherently unsafe about the older generation of AFCI breakers or is it a case of safe, safer, safest? Probably the latter, but upgrading is a prudent recommendation IMHO. 'Course, I wouldn't fault anyone what-so-ever who doesn't recommend such.
inspector57 Posted November 14, 2013 Report Posted November 14, 2013 Anyone have documented statistics about the effectiveness of AFCI devices? I know it is hard to prove that a fire didn't happen but I would think that after a decade or more of devices being required that there would be some sort of study proving that these expensive devices are or are not really doing the job.
hausdok Posted November 14, 2013 Author Report Posted November 14, 2013 Here's an article by Douglas Hansen about them: http://www.codecheck.com/cc/ccimages/PD ... eOfAge.pdf
Jim Katen Posted November 14, 2013 Report Posted November 14, 2013 I address it this way: Obsolete AFCI Protection Arc fault circuit interrupters (AFCIs) are special electrical devices that protect against arcs (electricity that jumps across a small gap and that reaches a temperature that's high enough to start a fire). This service panel is equipped with <#> AFCI breakers, but they're the older, "branch/feeder," type and are no longer permitted in new construction. They're significantly less effective than the newer, "combination," type, which can detect a greater range of arcing conditions and react to a lower level of fault current. To learn more about why these AFCI breakers are considered obsolete, read this article: www.codecheck.com/cc/ccimages/PDFs/AFCIsComeOfAge.pdf 1. Ask your electrician to replace the existing branch/feeder AFCI breakers with newer combination AFCI breakers.
Erby Posted November 14, 2013 Report Posted November 14, 2013 www.codecheck.com/cc/ccimages/...fAge.pdf Do you have that complete link, Jim?
rkenney Posted November 15, 2013 Report Posted November 15, 2013 http://www.codecheck.com/cc/ccimages/PD ... eOfAge.pdf (codecheck.com/cc/ccimages/PDFs/AFCIsComeOfAge.pdf)
hausdok Posted November 15, 2013 Author Report Posted November 15, 2013 Hmm, That's the same link I posted in #14. Guess it wasn't good enough. [^] ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
Marc Posted November 15, 2013 Report Posted November 15, 2013 Hmm, That's the same link I posted in #14. Guess it wasn't good enough. [^] ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike Nothing wrong with your link. Puters are like people, they's opinionated. Marc
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now