Chad Fabry Posted July 2, 2012 Report Share Posted July 2, 2012 Or is it? Click to Enlarge 48.64 KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Port Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 There is no 110.20 in the 2011 NEC. Looks like ity should be 110.28. 110.28 Enclosure Types. Enclosures (other than surrounding fences or walls) of switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, motor control centers, meter sockets, enclosed switches, transfer switches, power outlets, circuit breakers, adjustable-speed drive systems, pullout switches, portable power distribution equipment, termination boxes, general-purpose transformers, fire pump controllers, fire pump motors, and motor controllers, rated not over 600 volts nominal and intended for such locations, shall be marked with an enclosure-type number as shown in Table 110.28.Table 110.28 shall be used for selecting these enclosures for use in specific locations other than hazardous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Fabry Posted July 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 I thought the page and ink looked like they were damaged by corrosives. I laughed to myself and apparently, quite alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark P Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 I got it - clever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Holt Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 I don't have my codebook handy, but the picture refers to TABLE 110.20, not article 110.20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erby Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 Guys! It's not about 110.20 or 28. It's a paragraph on corrosive atmospheres that's been damaged by corrosive something! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 It was posted as a humorous observation. What's funny now is the visiting sparkys are the one's that don't get the joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Kogel Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 [:-party] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Port Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 I saw the intended humor Bill, I was just noting that the label was incorrect as well as damaged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 I saw the intended humor Bill, I was just noting that the label was incorrect as well as damaged. The label might not be incorrect, if it was printed between 2008 and 2011. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Fabry Posted August 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 This funnier than I hoped for. FWIW, it's not a label, it's the 2008 NEC that NY is still using. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now