kurt Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 Click to Enlarge 42.95 KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Baird Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 dig it...related to the new "mixed use" craze with commercial at street level and dwelling above? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exploreparadise2 Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 They have reviews on Yahoo. Tell me if that first review isn't a plant. It's a well written commercial loaded with search keywords. http://local.yahoo.com/info-41901381-aep-building-consultant-incorporated-chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Moore Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 Hmmm....the old sign-stuck-to-old-storage-shed advertising method. Do you think that would attract a higher end client than my current crazy-person-at-intersection-waving-sign campaign? 'Cos I'm getting a little tired of inspecting large cardboard boxes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Katen Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 Hmmm....the old sign-stuck-to-old-storage-shed advertising method. Do you think that would attract a higher end client than my current crazy-person-at-intersection-waving-sign campaign? 'Cos I'm getting a little tired of inspecting large cardboard boxes! That's not a storage shed, it's his office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 His sample reports can't possibly be real. Who would look at this and hire him? http://aepbuild.com/PDF/AEP%20Build%20S ... 092010.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Kibbel Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 The phone # on the sign is wrong. It should be 255, not 225. Marketing genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Posted February 17, 2012 Report Share Posted February 17, 2012 I don't want to pile on this guy, but the home inspection report on xxxx Mokena did not include the forklifts and storage units. Wasn't the report on the main sanctuary well written? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erby Posted February 18, 2012 Report Share Posted February 18, 2012 Hold on now, Bill. That top left cover has both numbers, the 255 at the top and the 225 at the bottom. Maybe he's got both numbers, ya think! NOT! Nope, 225 is on the home page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Lamb Posted February 18, 2012 Report Share Posted February 18, 2012 Security System: Normal for its age Basketball Court: Adequate Not alot of people read. They look at pictures then call to get an estimate. He'll be in business until his balls get sued off and then change the business name. The beat goes on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Dirks Jr Posted February 18, 2012 Report Share Posted February 18, 2012 The reviews in the link that Blair posted appear to have the same sort of grammar errors. It's like they were all written by the same person. That's not really a surprise though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgbinspect Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 "Unclear on Concept" Click to Enlarge 42.95?KB Good point... [:-tophat] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosier inspector Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Wow, a bed for only $199! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now