Robert Jones Posted September 23, 2011 Report Posted September 23, 2011 Was there a minimum height requirement for ceilings in the 40's? The reason I ask is the home I inspected today had a ceiling height of about 6' maybe 6'2". Home was a rambler built in 1941.
AHI in AR Posted September 23, 2011 Report Posted September 23, 2011 Hell if I know. But other than your curiosity, does it really matter? It's a 70 year old house. The buyer can clearly see what they are getting -- or not getting.
Richard Moore Posted September 23, 2011 Report Posted September 23, 2011 Have your clients seen the place and, if so, are they very short and have oversized hairy feet? Is this a short sale? I don't know if there were any height "requirements" (other than common sense) in 1941, but I have to wonder why someone would put an offer on such a place. It sounds very claustrophobic.
Robert Jones Posted September 23, 2011 Author Report Posted September 23, 2011 My clients were there and young first time buyers. I voiced my concerns about a few things rather strongly. I went so far as to say that when they replace the roof and underlying framing, they could raise the ceiling at that time. I also joked that it should help with heating costs. When finishing up I told my clients that it was very important to get some estimates for repair as the costs could add up rather quickly. Beautiful HUD home. Just needs new siding, a new service panel/lateral, roof and truss system, insulation(which had been taken over by rats), you get the idea. But hey, it was priced right at 70k[:-censore
Denray Posted October 7, 2011 Report Posted October 7, 2011 I looked at house a while back that was selling for 48k. The girl working at the hot dog stand at a miniature golf place was buying it. Her boyfriend was there during the inspection and kept acting like they could handle the problems I was seeing. Couldn't find access to the crawl. Bummer. I was talking to the neighbor and she just saw a rat run across the street and go underneath the pit bulls house.
Jim Katen Posted October 8, 2011 Report Posted October 8, 2011 Was there a minimum height requirement for ceilings in the 40's? The reason I ask is the home I inspected today had a ceiling height of about 6' maybe 6'2". Home was a rambler built in 1941. I don't know about a requirement, but I've inspected a whole lotta houses from that time period and none had 6'2" ceilings. If the ceiling height is original, it's a anomaly. Are you sure that someone didn't drop the ceilings in the '70s? That was very commonly done to save on heating costs.
hausdok Posted October 8, 2011 Report Posted October 8, 2011 Hi Robert, Is it possible that a new ceiling was added below the original. I've looked at a lot of '20's and 30's homes where plastered ceilings were coming apart; so, instead of fixing them, the owners framed up a new ceiling lower than the original and hung a new drywall ceiling. It's wasn't until I went into the attic, rooted around in the insulation and found the plaster and lath that I realized what had been done. There were still a lot of houses being plastered in the '40's. ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!! Mike
plummen Posted December 12, 2011 Report Posted December 12, 2011 Was there a minimum height requirement for ceilings in the 40's? The reason I ask is the home I inspected today had a ceiling height of about 6' maybe 6'2". Home was a rambler built in 1941. I don't know about a requirement, but I've inspected a whole lotta houses from that time period and none had 6'2" ceilings. If the ceiling height is original, it's a anomaly. Are you sure that someone didn't drop the ceilings in the '70s? That was very commonly done to save on heating costs. that would be my buess also
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now