Brandon Whitmore Posted July 19, 2011 Report Posted July 19, 2011 I am away from my office / book right now, but am being challenged on something I wrote up. A bath exhaust fan was not vented to the exterior (no duct). I wrote if up and specified that they vent directly to the exterior. All they did was push up a duct near the roof vent opening; my re- inspect report indicated the need to vent DIRECTLY to the exterior. The HVAC guy send a retort saying that I am wrong and that it meets code. Do any of you have the code or commentary handy that I can send out to them tonight? Here's what I have so far: Air must be exhausted directly to the outside 2006 IRC [303.3X] May not discharge to crawlspace or attic 2006 IRC [1501] And from a couple of manufacturers instructions: NuTone Broan I know that many/ most building officials are keying in on the word "directly", and making contractors do more than just push the ducts up near a roof vent, and have seen why many times. Does the commentary address this?(I hope) TIA.
Nolan Kienitz Posted July 19, 2011 Report Posted July 19, 2011 Brandon, From the 2006 IRC Code/Commentary. The commentary says that pointing to an existing static vent cap or such is not acceptable. =================== M1501.1 Outdoor discharge. The air removed by every mechanical exhaust system shall be discharged to the outdoors. Air shall not be exhausted into an attic, soffit, ridge vent or crawl space. Exception: Whole-house ventilation-type attic fans that discharge into the attic space of dwelling units having private attics shall be permitted. The primary intent of this section is to avoid exhausting contaminants into areas that may be occupied by people or into concealed spaces such as attics and crawl spaces where moisture can damage the building components. To prevent the introduction of contaminants into the ventilation air of a building, exhaust openings must not direct exhaust so that it could be readily drawn in by a ventilating system. In this situation, the code official must determine an appropriate separation or location for the placement of intake and exhaust openings. Attics and crawl spaces are not considered to be outdoors. Exhaust ducts cannot terminate in these spaces. Exhaust ducts must connect directly to terminals that pass through the building envelope to the outside atmosphere. Pointing, aiming or similarly directing an exhaust pipe or duct at an opening in the envelope of the building (that is, attic louver, grille, ridge vent, eave vent or soffit vent) in no way ensures that all or any of the exhaust will reach the outdoors. In fact, it is possible that the majority, if not all, of the exhaust vapors and gases will discharge to the attic space rather than to the outdoors.
fyrmnk Posted July 19, 2011 Report Posted July 19, 2011 FWIW, in my area on both sides of the state line 99.99% of new construction fans vent next to a ridge vent. At least in my area, I haven't seen any problems from it being done (not saying it's right, just haven't seen problems from it). I used to push to have people get them vented direct to the exterior on inspections, but have never seen any issues on 30+ year old houses without the extensions even ever being near the ridge vents (my own included). I now just recommend they extend them next to a ridge vent if the attic ventilation is done properly.
Brandon Whitmore Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Posted July 19, 2011 Awesome-- thanks Nolan. I was saying that placement of the ducts at/ near a vent didn't cause any problems a year or two back, and had a good debate over at IN. Since then, I've been paying close attention and have noticed some issues even when the duct is pushed right up to the screening. I'm not sure why, but there are times when the screening on the vents mold and plug up.
Nolan Kienitz Posted July 19, 2011 Report Posted July 19, 2011 I think Erby has some quite descriptive images of what goes wrong when not vented properly.
Brandon Whitmore Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Posted July 19, 2011 Thanks Nolan, I have some pictures of my own somewhere, but not near as good as his. First e- mail from listing agent: The HVAC contractor will be sending me a note stating that his venting of the bath fan is done to current code. For the record, he came highly recommended to me years ago from XMI Home Inspectors, and he is a senior expert in his field, self-employed as such for 20+ years. My reply was quite long and boring, so here was what I received via e- mail today [:-monkeyd Buyer's Agent: "Read below - you win. Of course you did. I will need you to let me know if their itemized list of repairs for the siding will do the job, as it looks good to me. Thanks again, you kick ass." Listing Agent: "So, my assistant Katlin called Ron about faxing the cited code stuff to him, and apparently he had already called the city and learned that current code would in fact require a correction on his part, so he will be addressing that tomorrow at the property himself." Thankfully, the code guy he spoke with knew what he was talking about, or this could have been drawn out, with or without all of the supporting documentation.
John Kogel Posted July 19, 2011 Report Posted July 19, 2011 In my climate, they not only need to be vented to the outside, but they also need to be sealed tight. On the flip side, I've seen houses aplenty with plank sheathing and minimal attic insulation, where a loose bath vent hose has not caused any problem whatsoever. Newer tight house with well insulated attic, no moist air is allowed. Here's a couple of recent stains I had to talk about. The first pic is directly above the master bath shower exhaust fan, short vent pipe straight up through the roof. Number two was a flaky duct tape seal. Click to Enlarge 67.61 KB Click to Enlarge 49.7 KB
ericwlewis Posted July 20, 2011 Report Posted July 20, 2011 Thanks Nolan, I have some pictures of my own somewhere, but not near as good as his. First e- mail from listing agent: The HVAC contractor will be sending me a note stating that his venting of the bath fan is done to current code. For the record, he came highly recommended to me years ago from XMI Home Inspectors, and he is a senior expert in his field, self-employed as such for 20+ years. My reply was quite long and boring, so here was what I received via e- mail today [:-monkeyd Buyer's Agent: "Read below - you win. Of course you did. I will need you to let me know if their itemized list of repairs for the siding will do the job, as it looks good to me. Thanks again, you kick ass." Listing Agent: "So, my assistant Katlin called Ron about faxing the cited code stuff to him, and apparently he had already called the city and learned that current code would in fact require a correction on his part, so he will be addressing that tomorrow at the property himself." Thankfully, the code guy he spoke with knew what he was talking about, or this could have been drawn out, with or without all of the supporting documentation. Go figure, a sub contractor trying to show up a home inspector by using code. Well maybe it was when he started 20+ years ago. "It was too hot to do it right" Maybe you could add "kicks ass" to your buisness card. Nice complement.
Jim Katen Posted July 20, 2011 Report Posted July 20, 2011 Thanks Nolan, I have some pictures of my own somewhere, but not near as good as his. First e- mail from listing agent: The HVAC contractor will be sending me a note stating that his venting of the bath fan is done to current code. For the record, he came highly recommended to me years ago from XMI Home Inspectors, and he is a senior expert in his field, self-employed as such for 20+ years. If XMI means AMI, please let me know who this guy is. My reply was quite long and boring, so here was what I received via e- mail today [:-monkeyd Buyer's Agent: "Read below - you win. Of course you did. I will need you to let me know if their itemized list of repairs for the siding will do the job, as it looks good to me. Thanks again, you kick ass." Listing Agent: "So, my assistant Katlin called Ron about faxing the cited code stuff to him, and apparently he had already called the city and learned that current code would in fact require a correction on his part, so he will be addressing that tomorrow at the property himself." Thankfully, the code guy he spoke with knew what he was talking about, or this could have been drawn out, with or without all of the supporting documentation. I like how they specified "current" code -- as if this has changed recently.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now