inspectorreuben Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 I'm sure this gap between the panel cover and the panel itself is wrong, but what code section might I reference if I need to? 110.12(A) ? Click to Enlarge 51.16 KB
Marc Posted March 23, 2011 Report Posted March 23, 2011 I'm sure this gap between the panel cover and the panel itself is wrong, but what code section might I reference if I need to? 110.12(A) ? Click to Enlarge 51.16 KB or 312.3 Keep in mind that Chad once said that drywall is a combustible material, if memory serves correctly. That would imply flush mounting, not recessed. Marc
Douglas Hansen Posted March 24, 2011 Report Posted March 24, 2011 Agreed - 312.3 says it must be flush to or proud of the finished surface when the wall is constructed of combustible material, e.g., wood studs. Did they set it back like this so they can shut that door over the face of the panel to hide it? Douglas Hansen
Nolan Kienitz Posted March 24, 2011 Report Posted March 24, 2011 Was/Is there a deadfront cover under the wood door? Actually I think that was Douglas' intent as well.
inspectorreuben Posted March 24, 2011 Author Report Posted March 24, 2011 or 312.3 Keep in mind that Chad once said that drywall is a combustible material, if memory serves correctly. That would imply flush mounting, not recessed. Marc Thank you, Marc. Did they set it back like this so they can shut that door over the face of the panel to hide it? Douglas Hansen Yes, exactly. Was/Is there a deadfront cover under the wood door? Actually I think that was Douglas' intent as well. Yes, the panel cover fits perfectly underneath the wood enclosure. This still allows about a 5/8" gap between the panel cabinet and the panel cover.
Darren Posted March 24, 2011 Report Posted March 24, 2011 Marc: This may help you out. Download Attachment: b_90_3.pdf 29.85 KB
Marc Posted March 24, 2011 Report Posted March 24, 2011 Marc: This may help you out. Download Attachment: b_90_3.pdf 29.85 KB Thanks. So, it seems that this new paperless sheetrock that's new on the market will be considered non-combustible since it has no paper facing. Marc
Douglas Hansen Posted March 24, 2011 Report Posted March 24, 2011 For electrical boxes, it makes a difference whether or not the wall surface material is considered combustible, and for that application gypsum board is considered noncombustible in the NEC. If the wall surface is wood or other combustible material, the box must be flush with or proud of the surface. If the wall surface is gypsum board, the maximum setback is 1/4 inch. (314.20) For electrical panels, the surface material is not the determining factor; what matters is the combustibility of the wall structure. Panels in wood-framed walls must be flush with or proud of the surface. Panels in steel-stud walls with a gypsum board surface are allowed a maximum setback of 1/4 inch. (312.3) Douglas Hansen
inspectorreuben Posted March 25, 2011 Author Report Posted March 25, 2011 For electrical boxes, it makes a difference whether or not the wall surface material is considered combustible, and for that application gypsum board is considered noncombustible in the NEC. If the wall surface is wood or other combustible material, the box must be flush with or proud of the surface. If the wall surface is gypsum board, the maximum setback is 1/4 inch. (314.20) For electrical panels, the surface material is not the determining factor; what matters is the combustibility of the wall structure. Panels in wood-framed walls must be flush with or proud of the surface. Panels in steel-stud walls with a gypsum board surface are allowed a maximum setback of 1/4 inch. (312.3) Douglas Hansen Thanks Douglas. Where's the emoticon of someone bowing down and saying "I'm not worthy" ? - Reuben
Jim Morrison Posted March 25, 2011 Report Posted March 25, 2011 Thanks Douglas. Where's the emoticon of someone bowing down and saying "I'm not worthy" ? - Reuben By universal agreement, that is implied whenever one addresess him by his first name. Lesser inspectors -and I include myself here- simply refer to him as: Dr. Shock.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now