Jim Katen Posted December 6, 2010 Report Posted December 6, 2010 Are you sure? I'm with Kurt, thinking all abandoned wiring should be removed. Pretty sure I learned that here. It seems like a good idea, but it's not a requirment of the NEC. The NEC only requires it when there are certain very limited conditions, such as in underfloor raceways, cellular concrete floor or metal floor raceways, and for IT equipment as Jim Port mentioned. - Jim Katen, Oregon
Harry Janssen Posted December 9, 2010 Report Posted December 9, 2010 Most insurance companies,want it replaced as it is not adequate for todays life style
plummen Posted January 8, 2011 Report Posted January 8, 2011 From what I hear from the insurance guys that I know, it depends on if you're already a client or applying for insurance . Most underwriters prefer that it be removed but some of the smaller companies will take having it disconnected and certified by an electrical contractor. One of my friends also told me that if it is just disconnected that the premiums will be higher. I'm not sure that makes sense but ultimately it's just all about the money anyway. most decent city electrical inspectors require unused wire to be removed when accesable
JohnJonny Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 Many old houses such as those from late 1880's-early 1900's still have K&T. Many Insurance companies do not refuse coverage. I have worked on many homes in the historic district. Never heard any complaints from homeowner that they couldn't get coverage. I myself have a 120 year old house. My insurance company is a very large and well known company. Had no problems getting coverage although I have K&T. And, no, my premiums were not higher.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now