I Think ASHI was wise in writing in the standards a couple of related items; 'not required to write code violations and not required to write up repair specifications. I am willing to be judged in court by the ASHI standards, and thankfully after 26 years that hasn't come up, but there are a couple of ways to set yourself higher standards to be judged in court by. First is using the "Code" word in the inspection report. I consider that this is raising the standard by which one inspects by, such that if someone makes a claim that a code violation was missed it becomes difficult to use ASHI standards as a defence when the report includes other code violations. Some inspectors even advertise that they exceed ASHI standards, wow, now what standards will the court go by - likely any one the plantiffs' attorny wants. Some here seem to know all the codes well enough to cite all violations and thats admirable - I can't and have never written up a violation as "Code". In my area it becomes a problem when something is written up as wrong and so do "x". The buyers then demand the sellers do "x" and the sellers want something other than "because the inspector said so" , they want a reference. This creates contract issues and nobodies happy. Personally I would have writin this issue as "I consider the exposed gas line a potential hazard such as by damage from tripping on. I recommend having the gas co. or lic. plumber check and make recommendation" I have alerted the buyer, the buyers not going to ask the sellers to fix, and I have made a recommendation. Its always worked for me anyway.