Jump to content

Nolan Kienitz

Members
  • Posts

    1,478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Nolan Kienitz

  1. If the valve were rotated to be on the right side of the faucet then pushing it back would be hot. What I would perceive as "expected".

    This one is still doing the same thing, but has been rotate to the 'left' side of the faucet.

  2. Just wait until it starts a slow, dripping leak ...

    Obviously won't be testing the TPR Valve like the manufacturer states we (as homeowners) are supposed to do (once per year) ... I know, I know ... nobody does that anyway. [:-crazy]

  3. Standard practice here for every home to have its own regulator if in a high pressure area. Pretty common to see excessive pressure, especially in areas in the suburbs where a new water tower has been added. Highest I have observed was over 125 psi. Now that is excessive!

    We are required to report on both pressure and functional flow.

    Jim L. - I've been thinking about just taking a shower with all those high/low/overhead sprays with the classical music playing ... like the TV commercial.

    I think that would handle the "functional flow" test.

    [:-slaphap

  4. RE: Texas TREC SOP

    We've been working to remove the "requirement" for the static water pressure readings in our SOP and had it out. Of course if an HI wants to test he/she is more than welcome to do as they wish.

    The static pressure requirement was "forced" back into the SOP just a couple of weeks ago as an individual rather high in the food chain of the governor's office intervened and spent many hours on the phone with the chair of the SOP committee. After that phone call the requirement was put back into our proposed-new-SOP.

    So ... politics at it's best in Texas from the state's highest office down to the level of what we inspector's are being required to inspect and not inspect.

    Don't tell me that a 'state-controlled' inspector's group is a good thing.

    I feel more and more that I'm doing an inspection to be sure I'm doing a CYA so that I don't get set up for fines from the penalty matrix or worse.

    Can be frustrating.

  5. 40 to 80 is the IRC required range.

    Below is low ... over is high.

    Texas TREC SOP requires that HIs check for water pressure. If they don't and get caught it ends up being a fine from the TREC Inspector's Penalty Matrix that can be 'spensive.

  6. The Texas TREC SOP requires that we test/run appliances. The SOP does indicate testing in "basic" mode.

    Basic mode meaning that I do NOT test convection or any other special capabilities.

    Basic is "BASIC". D/W run on 'short cycle' with soap tray cover engaged to ensure it has 'opened' after the cycle. Ovens ... turn on broiler (do the coils light up Y/N) then turn it to 350-degrees with an oven thermometer inside to see if the resulting temp (after an hour or so) is +/- 25-degrees of the requested 350. Yes the 350 and the =/- is in the SOP.

    Now if my oven was outside of 25 degrees +/- I would not be a happy camper ... now mind you I do a lot of cooking at home and my oven had best be damn close to what temp I call for.

    All in all ... a lot of verbiage above, but truly not a big deal.

    I'm just not sure about having to deal with the TREC moving our "doorbell" item from the Appliances chapter to the Electrical/Branch Circuit Chapter in our SOP and 7-3 report template ... That could give me some heartburn ... [;)]

    As for them being part of an SOP ... I really don't care as it is a requirement in the state where I inspect and am licensed and required to already inspect such.

    As for ASHI or any other state ... I would not have any problems with them adding such.

    Like Jimmy noted ... not something to get one's knickers is a wad about.

  7. Always with the astute analysis........our correspondent at the Globe.

    Speaking of Standards.....

    ASHI is in the process of review and changes again. Inspecting appliances has come up as a mildly controversial inclusion.

    Should appliances be part of any SOP?

    FWIW ... they (appliances) are still in the new/proposed Texas TREC SOP ... albeit they did remove the actual listing in the form template for the "trash compactor" and "whole-house vacuum".

    Albeit the HI can still choose to report on them if they so choose.

    They also moved "doorbells" from the Appliance chapter to the Branch Circuit Electrical chapter.

    ... we're styling down here ... [;)]

  8. Bad regulation is worse than no regulation.

    Having the foxes guard the hen house is never a good idea and that is what we have here in Texas.

    HI's are regulated by the Real Estate Commission which is run by the real estate agents.

    I've been hoping they would move us to the state licensing board since I started but it will never happen since the real estate agents voice is so much louder and more profitable for the politicians.

    The voting public does not understand nor care so the politicians and bureaucrats continue unabated.

    Mississippi inspectors would do well to talk to their representatives and introduce a workable bill that would help them control their own destiny.

    Once they are moved into the realtor board, there is no way back!

    It is even getting worse in Texas. TREC announced (just this week) two new appointees to the Inspector's Advisory Committee (always has been made up of inspectors with two 'public' members) for six year terms. One of the appointees is connected with a realtor's association in Central Texas as an executive and the other is a TREC licensed inspector as well as an agent/broker ... yet there is not any documentation on the respective websites of the "two licenses" being held by the same person. This person is also an executive with a local realtor's association in one of the D/FW suburbs.

    What I see happening is a further dilution of what little strength the IAC had now that there are agents/brokers on the same committee.

    We are also going through a two-year re-write of the SOP to what is becoming a realtor friendly document ... according to many who have viewed same.

    I sometimes feel that inspecting in Texas is far more about a CYA situation so that you don't get in a situation where TREC can slap you for something that means nothing in the overall scheme of what you are trying to do for the potential home buyer.

    To say the least it is an interesting conundrum down here as well.

  9. I've had BofA and WF reps call me over the past year or so wanting FHA Finals (92051 forms) for many new home construction and repair projects.

    They would not pay over $50.00 for the report. I had to send the caller a lo-dose Bayer aspirin to help arrest their cardiac arrest when I provided my minimum fee for those ... close to $400.

    Goes without saying I didn't do any for them.

    From what I've heard of late things are not getting any better in many sectors. Much more CYA paperwork being generated.

  10. Ditto what Scott P. and others have said.

    I don't haggle either. I gather information during our conversation and make my determination what the fee will be as I'm providing background to the caller in the hopes of locking the deal.

    I had a call from a mortgage company today needing an FHA Final (92051 form). I provided her my quote and knew straight-a-way she was looking for someone who would only charge $50. She said she would call back ... I'm still waiting for the ring. [;)]

    I don't back out of my driveway for less than $375 + mileage on those.

  11. I stopped pushing the buttons on any of them about 7 years ago after I had the local fire department dispatch, roll with sirens to the home I was inspecting at the time. Happened 3 different times over the course of one year.

    One time I held face down on kitchen counter with hands about to be cuffed until I finally got the authorities to understand I was not stealing anything.

    At the time my truck had signs and everything.

    All due to the alarms being tied into a home security system that was active.

    Two of the homes were vacant.

    Then there was the back/forth about who was going to pay for the "false alarm" call.

    Quick decision for me to 'never again' push those buttons.

    I have to disclaim same here in Texas as TREC "requires" via the SOP that we have to push them as well.

    Were all 3 systems being monotored by the same company? The reason I ask is I've never heard of that happening, so maybe it was a local issue with the way the security systems were being installed. It seams resonable that a smoke detector could be tested without alerting the security company. I've set off a few alarms and had cops show up (just happened last week) but not due to testing a smoke detector.

    I had none at the time nor do I have any clue. When you walk in to inspect a home do you know if the home security system is active and doing all the possible things it can do?

    I didn't (at the time) and I don't have (today) any way to find that out before I inspect a property.

    I err on the side of safety (after my experience) and assume that the site is live and being monitored ... if there is a security system installed.

    .

  12. I stopped pushing the buttons on any of them about 7 years ago after I had the local fire department dispatch, roll with sirens to the home I was inspecting at the time. Happened 3 different times over the course of one year.

    One time I held face down on kitchen counter with hands about to be cuffed until I finally got the authorities to understand I was not stealing anything.

    At the time my truck had signs and everything.

    All due to the alarms being tied into a home security system that was active.

    Two of the homes were vacant.

    Then there was the back/forth about who was going to pay for the "false alarm" call.

    Quick decision for me to 'never again' push those buttons.

    I have to disclaim same here in Texas as TREC "requires" via the SOP that we have to push them as well.

×
×
  • Create New...