I found this thread by searching for *** Inspection Group reviews...why? Because they conducted a ridiculous inspection on my beautiful 3 year old home that would have any buyer running for the hills. I have since had two separate inspections conducted to the home, both of which have come back with the exact opposite conclusion of what *** Inspection has found. This thread is obviously for Inspectors to pat each other on the back and to "stand up for the profession"... but when is it time to take responsibility for flawed inspections that cost homeowners hundreds of thousands of dollars? If you people didn't approach your job with a need to find something wrong in order to feel like you've done your job, then I wouldn't be on this thread. But the fact is that many inspectors think it is their duty to find flaws in properties vs. providing a potential buyer with a realistic assessment of a home that they are obviously interested in. I am not a lawyer, I've never taken anyone to court before... but I am planning to file a civil suit against *** Inspection Group for filing a report with zero basis of truth or proof, which has been independently proven false twice. When inspectors offer a discount for multiple inspections, they build in incentive for themselves to scare potential buyers off of 1st properties... it's poor business practice and it happens throughout your profession. I will win my case with a full thermography scan in hand that completely refutes the original inspection. HDYLTA?