| Posted By |
|
|
|
| |
Member
|
Rochester, MN
Posts: 83
Joined: Apr, 2002
|  offline
|
|
 Thread Start First Page
[#1] Posted: Mar 09 2006 - 9:46:25 PM |  |  |
|
I know that two conductors are permitted on Square D breakers. Does anyone have a list of other manufactures that allow two terminations?
Robert E Lee
GENERAL Home Inspections, Inc
Rochester, MN
|
|
|
|
| |
Associate Editor - TIJ
|
Gaston, Oregon
Posts: 5386
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
|
|
| |
Moderator
|
Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 417
Joined: Oct, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#3] Posted: Mar 09 2006 - 11:06:59 PM | | |
|
Well done Jim.
That's the nicest job of putting that information together I've seen.
I think it may even deserve a Guinness, in fact I just opened one in tribute to you.
|
Scott Warga
ACSI American Construction Specialists & investigations
Arizona |
| |
|
|
| |
Associate Editor - TIJ
|
DeWitt, Mi
Posts: 2559
Joined: Jan, 2004
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#4] Posted: Mar 10 2006 - 04:22:28 AM | | |
|
I swear Jim does that stuff at night and just waits for someone to ask!
|
Les
|
| |
|
|
| |
Member
|
Rochester, MN
Posts: 83
Joined: Apr, 2002
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#5] Posted: Mar 10 2006 - 04:30:48 AM | | |
|
Thanks so much Jim. On my last inspection yesterday I called out a double tap connection on a GE breaker, the homeowner indicated that was how the electrician wired the panel. When talking with the electrical contractor he of course was sure it was correct (but was going to check with his supplier). I've attached a photo that I included in the report.
Robert E Lee
GENERAL Home Inspections, Inc
Rochester, MN
Download Attachment:
Image Unavailable! Sorry you must be logged in to view images.
Click Here For Free Registration
121.58 KB
|
| |
|
|
| |
Member
|
West Bend, Wisconsin
Posts: 189
Joined: May, 2005
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#6] Posted: Mar 10 2006 - 05:15:37 AM | | |
|
This is why I find this board so great. It is the people willing to step out of the box and share thier expertise with others that make the inspector community a very special fraternity.
|
Carl Eisen
Appletree Home Inspections LLC
www.appletreeinspections.com
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it."
- Yogi Berra
|
| |
|
|
| |
Senior Member
|
Lexington, KY
Posts: 1726
Joined: Nov, 2004
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#7] Posted: Mar 12 2006 - 3:28:07 PM | | |
|
Splendidly done, Jim. Can I have your permission to give a copy of this to intransigent sellers, electricians, and/or seller's realtors?
John
|
| |
|
|
| |
Associate Editor - TIJ
|
Gaston, Oregon
Posts: 5386
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
|
|
| |
Senior Member
|
Lexington, KY
Posts: 1726
Joined: Nov, 2004
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#9] Posted: Mar 12 2006 - 6:40:46 PM | | |
|
Promise . . . and thanks.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Moderator
|
Columbus, Mississippi
Posts: 3140
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#10] Posted: Mar 12 2006 - 10:02:01 PM | | |
|
"Some (not all) Square D breakers are designed to accept two wires."
An important point. I think most HI's would be amazed to look through a full Square D catalog and see the incredible number of different breakers they manufacture (as do the other big manufacturers). It's mind-boggling. Only one or two types are rated for this use, and not all sizes of those types.
Jim, I'm curious...what's your personal opinion of double-tap rated breakers? Good idea? Bad? I admit I find this on my list of currently blessed electrical ideas that I don't like, along with multi-wire circuits, back-stabbed devices, split bus panels, the 6 movements rule in place of a real main breaker, existing AFCI's, etc.
Brian G.
Electrical Curmudgeon 
|
| www.accuspecllc.com |
| |
|
|
| |
Associate Editor - TIJ
|
Seattle, WA
Posts: 1946
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#11] Posted: Mar 12 2006 - 11:25:56 PM | | |
|
Brian,
I wouldn't presume to answer for Jim, but my two cents...
Circuit abuse can happen anywhere! If you add a new fixture or receptacle, is it better to add a junction box and wire-nut 3 hots, 3 neutrals, and 3 grounds, or to run a cable to the panel and secure 3 serparate wires under terminals designed to hold those wires very securely? I've posted a close-up of the Square-D version a couple of times, and there is no doubt it is well designed to hold two conductors.
Could you be tempted to overload the breaker this way? Of course, but I see little difference between that and an idiot with a box of wire-nuts. The breaker can look after itself.
I see far more double-taps on breakers not designed for them, than I do on the breakers that are. Is it safer to tempt someone to do the double nasty thing or to give them a viable option?
I am definitley with you on the split-bus panels! More than a single throw may be needed in some special circumstances such as large services, and hence the limit of six or more than one. I think the manufacturers took adavntage of the code to produce a slightly cheaper product and the split-bus panel is the unintended bastard son. Whenever they get together, the NEC should insist the manufacturers wear a condom!
|
Richard Moore
Rest Assured Inspection Services
Seattle, WA
http://www.rainspect.com
|
| |
|
|
| |
Associate Editor - TIJ
|
Gaston, Oregon
Posts: 5386
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#12] Posted: Mar 14 2006 - 7:51:23 PM | | |
|
Quote: Originally posted by Brian G.. . . Jim, I'm curious...what's your personal opinion of double-tap rated breakers? Good idea? Bad? I admit I find this on my list of currently blessed electrical ideas that I don't like, along with multi-wire circuits, back-stabbed devices, split bus panels, the 6 movements rule in place of a real main breaker, existing AFCI's, etc. Brian G. Electrical Curmudgeon
I feel no ill will toward the double tap rated breakers. They seem to work just fine.
Multi-wire circuits have a long and proud history. Plus I like the elegance of them. And after all, the entire service is really one big multi-wire circuit, no?
Back-stab devices suck. Their entire raison d'etre is to encourage quick, cheap work and lower the bottom line. On the other hand, I love those breakers where you stick the stripped wire in the little hole and then tighten the screw. Nice design.
Split bus panels were a poor idea. Too easy to overload them.
The 6 movement rule is ok by me. Without it, a lot of installations would be very expensive to expand.
Existing AFCIs are a cruel and expensive joke.
- Jim Katen, Oregon
|
| |
|
|
| |
Moderator
|
Columbus, Mississippi
Posts: 3140
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#13] Posted: Mar 14 2006 - 9:27:06 PM | | |
|
Originally posted by Jim Katen
I feel no ill will toward the double tap rated breakers. They seem to work just fine.
I have no particular adverse experience with them to this point, but the basic idea of putting two circuits on one breaker bothers me. I think tandem breakers make more sense if you need to get the extra circuits somehow. Why wasn't that good enough anymore? These things are purely about economics, not improving anything (like safety).
Multi-wire circuits have a long and proud history. Plus I like the elegance of them. And after all, the entire service is really one big multi-wire circuit, no?
(edited due to brain cramp)Okay, I missed the idea at first but I see what you're saying. Is that a good idea in branch wiring though? Where else are you allowed (much less required) to tie the handles of two 110v circuits together?
I think they're unnecessarily complicating, and offer no real benefit to balance to the equation. From surfing various boards I know this thing confuses a lot of HI's and electricians. Just pull a second 12/2 WG, set a second box, and put in two single recepticles. Far simpler, little extra expense, and the safest possible arrangement (now and later).
The 6 movement rule is ok by me. Without it, a lot of installations would be very expensive to expand.
Could you give me an example? I realize a main isn't needed in every panel and every situation, I just think that where one is needed one should be required, not six. I see that rule as a dinosaur where residential service equipment is concerned.
I think all three of these fall into "because we can" rather than "because we should".
Brian G.
A Man With No Strong Opinions 
|
| www.accuspecllc.com |
| |
|
|
| |
Administrator
|
Chicago, IL
Posts: 5930
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#14] Posted: Mar 15 2006 - 03:57:05 AM | | |
|
Brian, I think you need a vacation.
|
Kurt in Chicago
Workin' the Inner City
"Things are more like they are now than they ever have been before"
Dwight D. Eisenhower |
| |
|
|
| |
Senior Member
|
Sagamore Hills, Ohio
Posts: 2397
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#15] Posted: Mar 15 2006 - 10:25:41 AM | | |
|
Jim,
Thanks very much for a great write-up.
|
Terry
http://www.hlis.net
|
| |
|
|
| |
Moderator
|
Columbus, Mississippi
Posts: 3140
Joined: Dec, 2003
| offline
|
|
Allowable double taps
[#16] Posted: Mar 15 2006 - 12:28:24 PM | | |
|
Originally posted by kurt
Brian, I think you need a vacation.
Are you buying? 
Hey Jim, if I'm pestering you just say the word and I'll drop it. If not I want to know why you think what you think. If it adds up I may need to adapt my own thinking; if not I'll hold what I've got.
Brian G.
The Mosquito 
|
| www.accuspecllc.com |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowable double taps
